View Single Post
Old 07-06-2009, 09:09 PM   #11
BGMaverick9
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,806
BGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jthig32 View Post
I would much, much rather have Rip.

However, don't forget how valuable Josh is right now due to his contract. IF Josh and Marion don't work together, you could theoretically trade Josh for a far better return that what Stack would bring, because he's useful and a larger expiring contract.

I do really, really fear how quickly Marion's going to decline.

One thing to also keep in mind is that the Mavs could be trying to facilitate a three way trade where Marion goes elsewhere for a piece that fits better. DLord touched on this at DB.com today.
There is some serious concern, for sure.
Just off the early ideas this isn't like a OH SH!T this is awesome deal, but it sounds good because we got something of better than average value for dead weight.

Josh and Damp clearly become the next pieces available for trade.

But this goes off of Flac's question yesterday. Kidd signed based off the numbers we know and stuff Cuban told him. He wouldn't necessarily sign if he didn't like what he heard. So, he likes the idea of Marion or could've even suggested it.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/BallinWithBryan/
BGMaverick9 is offline   Reply With Quote