View Single Post
Old 06-05-2009, 06:10 PM   #210
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude1394 View Post
I understand his words pretty completely while campaigning. He wanted out 2 years ago..OUT..He (and most liberals) were proven wrong that the battle was lost and the country has stabalized.
If the US had done what Barry wanted, there would have been genocide, he knows it, you knows it and the Iraqi's sure knows it.
no, not at all.

Quote:
The use of the term genocide is completely appropriate. The greater risk was NOT staying in Iraq, it was leaving and allowing the blood to flow.
you seem to confuse the concept of ethnic conflict with that of genocide.

as it relates to iraq, the truth is that it is up to the iraqis to acheive peaceful coexistence with each other, and to have a society that functions with its citizens not threatened with violence. the usa and our military cannot make this happen, only the iraqis themselves.
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote