Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post - Dal-LAL

SeriousSummer · 06-24-2005, 02:19 PM

For a board that seems to think Damp is a pile of crap, this is awfully negative talk. Vlade would probably retire, if not Dallas wouldn't pick up the team option on his contract. That only leaves Mihm with two years on his contract (instead of 5 on Damp's) at half the cost. Since the Mavs seem to think Pavel is a better prospect than DJ, losing him wouldn't be such a big deal.

I wouldn't do this deal, but given Mihm's production last year was almost as good as Damp's, that's he's years younger and has a significantly lower salary and significantly fewer years, this isn't a silly deal at all.

06-24-2005, 02:19 PM	#7
SeriousSummer Golden Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,589	RE:Dal-LAL For a board that seems to think Damp is a pile of crap, this is awfully negative talk. Vlade would probably retire, if not Dallas wouldn't pick up the team option on his contract. That only leaves Mihm with two years on his contract (instead of 5 on Damp's) at half the cost. Since the Mavs seem to think Pavel is a better prospect than DJ, losing him wouldn't be such a big deal. I wouldn't do this deal, but given Mihm's production last year was almost as good as Damp's, that's he's years younger and has a significantly lower salary and significantly fewer years, this isn't a silly deal at all.