[dalmations202]

Originally Posted by chumdawg

This is specious reasoning. The series turned when the Warriors gave away the lead in the last minute of Game Two. And that's not to mention that they had a shot in the air that would have won Game One.

Nellie has nothing to do with Pietrus and Davis missing three free throws in the final minute. He has nothing to do with Davis making a brain-dead turnover. Nellie's gameplan worked TO A TEE. They should have won that game.

And if they win Game Two...and then go to blow them out in Game Three...well, I might like their chances a little better in Game Four.

If it's 3-1 Golden State after four...well, Utah would be at home right now.

This makes the same sense as "If Dallas would have done this, or GS wouldn't have hit that shot, then the outcome would have been different."

That is why the games are played.

GSW shot out of there minds against Dallas. Dallas played one of the worse series they have all year. If either of these would have been different, then the outcome would have been different. If GSW would have shot that efficiently against Utah, and Utah would have been less efficient, then GSW would have won. Same logic.

If I would have put the winning numbers instead of losing ones on that lottery ticket before the drawing, then I would have won.