View Single Post
Old 09-16-2008, 11:09 AM   #12
ribosoma
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greater Nowheres
Posts: 1,189
ribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalmations202
I am beginning to come around to the Mavdog way of thinking. I have 6 kids and three of them are teenagers, so my vote is a voters registration card instead of a birth certificate.

Once they turn 18 (and get a job and out of the house) -- no more abortion of them.

We could then argue about whether the ones that stay at home living with mom and dad should be eligible to be aborted even though they have passed man's date of decision.

What's the difference? They are alive at conception and it is (wo)man's date to decide when they die according to the US government (Roe V Wade).

Hitler thought that the infirm should go as well. Then the Jews. The aged. We might as well keep our stupidity going. Pick a race that should die, and maybe an eye color.

It all comes from the same place -- and it starts with SELF.
Who knows, maybe after saving that unborn, beautiful, self-less child of Jehova, they are fortunate enough to be seized by the power and might of the clan of the blue-eye and engage in genocide for profit in a foreign land... and kill... what used to be unborn babies...

The hypocrisy of the schizophrenic self-styled religious right has roots that run deep. In the monotheistic reality tunnel, the Godhead is the State. It has always been this way. The Lord sits upon his throne and is benevolent enough to allow his flock to feed from his scraps and lick the remnants of his last meal from his pretty white beard.

Those unborn babies are no more or less divine than the homeless man we walked past and sneered at, or the Iraqi family reduced to protoplasm for your blessed God's enjoyment and material gain.

This issue is about the desire to legislate a morality. Such a need is indicative of weakness and impotence, not strength. The irony here being that the "right" side of the false dialectic/deftly-crafted social control mechanism/political spectrum seeks to force someone else to follow a code that they believe in. This is supposedly a tactic of the "left" side of the aforementioned false dialectic. Both sides attempting to rip each others' eyes out over who should die next.
ribosoma is offline   Reply With Quote