Thread: Larry Hughes
View Single Post
Old 02-02-2010, 12:12 PM   #6
Underdog
Moderator
 
Underdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
Underdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond repute
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMC0007 View Post
The problem isn't Josh Howard as much as it is Josh Howards salary.

If he made considerably less money things would be different in my eyes.
No, the problem with Josh Howard is that he's a loser in decline.

I'd agree about "salary vs. talent" if we were talking about Damp in recent years, but Larry Hughes is also a loser in decline so the money doesn't matter.

This team does not need any more losers in decline.
__________________

These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Underdog is offline   Reply With Quote