View Single Post
Old 09-27-2008, 11:54 AM   #64
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default

it is absurd to direct blame for the current crisis on the cra. there isn't any data that supports your position.

the cra has NOTHING to do with option arms, nor 100% financed mortgages. the act was to stop redlining, not to change lending standards. the cra does not mandate loose lending requirements. it also was not just directed to mortgages but also to small business lending.

the primary writers of the risky mortgages, such a countrywide or indymac, aren't even involved with the cra, they were not governed by its provisions.

it is also wrong to characterize lower income borrowers as all sub-prime credit risks. lower income does not equate to a sub-prime credit rating.

take a look at the locations of home foreclosures, they are not concentrated in low income neighborhoods that the cra was intended to aid.

Last edited by Mavdog; 09-27-2008 at 11:57 AM.
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote