Loyality Revisited - Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

seelenjaeger · 01-11-2004, 11:34 PM

Just a little ... good night trade ... not too serious, but who would bite?

Dallas trades: PF Antoine Walker (16.7 ppg, 9.4 rpg, 5.0 apg in 37.9 minutes)
PG Steve Nash (14.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 8.1 apg in 33.5 minutes)
Dallas receives: PF Chris Webber
PG Bobby Jackson (13.7 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 2.4 apg in 24.6 minutes)

Sacramento trades: PF Chris Webber
PG Bobby Jackson (13.7 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 2.4 apg in 24.6 minutes)
Sacramento receives: PF Antoine Walker (16.7 ppg, 9.4 rpg, 5.0 apg in 35 games)
PG Steve Nash (14.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 8.1 apg in 34 games)

TRADE ACCEPTED

seelenjaeger · 01-11-2004, 11:39 PM

Or maybe ...

Sacramento trades: Chris Webber ( ppg, rpg, apg in minutes)
PG Mike Bibby (17.4 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 5.7 apg in 33.6 minutes)
PF Lawrence Funderburke
PG Bobby Jackson (13.7 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 2.4 apg in 24.6 minutes)
Sacramento receives: PG Steve Nash (14.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 8.1 apg in 33.5 minutes)
PF Antoine Walker (16.7 ppg, 9.4 rpg, 5.0 apg in 37.9 minutes)
SF Antawn Jamison (15.4 ppg, 6.7 rpg, 1.0 apg in 29.9 minutes)

Dallas trades: PG Steve Nash (14.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 8.1 apg in 33.5 minutes)
PF Antoine Walker (16.7 ppg, 9.4 rpg, 5.0 apg in 37.9 minutes)
SF Antawn Jamison (15.4 ppg, 6.7 rpg, 1.0 apg in 29.9 minutes)
Dallas receives: Chris Webber ( ppg, rpg, apg in games)
PG Mike Bibby (17.4 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 5.7 apg in 34 games)
PF Lawrence Funderburke
PG Bobby Jackson (13.7 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 2.4 apg in 33 games)

TRADE ACCEPTED

Dirkenstien · 01-12-2004, 02:09 AM

I would hate to lose Nash but this certianly is enticing because of the defense and toughness both Jackson and Funerburk bring. I wonder how it would work with both Webber and Dirk in at the same time in regards to their position on the floor.

MightyToine · 01-12-2004, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by: Dirkenstien
I would hate to lose Nash but this certianly is enticing because of the defense and toughness both Jackson and Funerburk bring. I wonder how it would work with both Webber and Dirk in at the same time in regards to their position on the floor.

Quick Question : Ever stop to think Why Sacramento would do this trade?

Didn't think so. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

Jamisonite · 01-12-2004, 10:09 AM

Sac town prob wouldnt...but neither would i...Webber is getting up there in the age category and that is shown by his injuries

LRB · 01-12-2004, 01:17 PM

No way I see Sacramento doing this. And I don't think that it would solve all our problems. There are better ways to get rid of Walker.

MightyToine · 01-12-2004, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by: LRB
No way I see Sacramento doing this. And I don't think that it would solve all our problems. There are better ways to get rid of Walker.

You are so mean. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

rakesh.s · 01-12-2004, 01:37 PM

no chance at this deal..sac would probably start laughing

jackson is a way better defender than nash and webber is a much much better player than walker

MightyToine · 01-12-2004, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by: rakesh.s
no chance at this deal..sac would probably start laughing

jackson is a way better defender than nash and webber is a much much better player than walker

NOT TRUE! You see.....Walker always knows how many timeouts there are remaining!! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

Dirkenstien · 01-12-2004, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by: MightyToine

Quote:

Originally posted by: Dirkenstien
I would hate to lose Nash but this certianly is enticing because of the defense and toughness both Jackson and Funerburk bring. I wonder how it would work with both Webber and Dirk in at the same time in regards to their position on the floor.

Quick Question : Ever stop to think Why Sacramento would do this trade?

Didn't think so. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

Oh, I know sac town wouldnt do this..but the question was who would bite. Yeah I'd bite, unfortunately i cant speak for sacramento but i seriously doubt they would. Anyways, it was just for fun..just as SJ said, nothing too serious.

jayC · 01-12-2004, 08:39 PM

Finley has been sucking up too this season. Why all the hate toward walker. He just does what every mav does. Jack it up.

jimmychipwood · 01-12-2004, 09:57 PM

MT, I say as I laugh out loud, you must be on crack.

Now that we got that cleared up, I agree with your first comment, why would Sac do this? Why would we? It's always fun to think about it though.

What do we really need? Needs prioritized:

1. A 7' Center who is muscular, athletic enough to be a fiend on the boards, and can move his feet to play defense, be a shot-blocking threat
2. Ridding ourselves of Antoine Walker
3. A backup point-guard who can fill it up - handle and score
4. A leader to emerge
5. A coach not on crack.

Golden State trades:
C Erick Dampier (10.9 ppg, 10.9 rpg, 0.7 apg in 31.4 minutes)
PG Nick Van Exel (13.3 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 6.2 apg in 34.0 minutes)

Golden State receives: SF Josh Howard (8.4 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 1.3 apg in 28 games)
SF Eduardo Najera (3.3 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 0.4 apg in 28 games)
PF Antoine Walker (16.5 ppg, 9.3 rpg, 4.9 apg in 36 games)

TRADE ACCEPTED

As part of the deal, GS has to cut Avery Johnson so that he can be picked up by Dallas. Dallas also throws in a #1 pick.

New Lineup:
Nash/VanExel
Finley/VanExel
Jamison/Daniels
Nowitzki/Fortson
Dampier/Bradley

We have to give to get. Golden State gets rid of Van Exel, who is causing trouble with the coach. They give up a lot in Dampier, but they get a look at Walker, a good rookie in Howard, a serviceable backup and great draw in Najera, and a #1.

We get toughness in the playoffs, a balanced roster, and our first of two consecutive championships after we can Nelson and hire Riley for next year.

MightyToine · 01-13-2004, 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by: jimmychipwood
MT, I say as I laugh out loud, you must be on crack.

Please Explain. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-frown.gif[/img]

Quote:

Now that we got that cleared up, I agree with your first comment, why would Sac do this? Why would we? It's always fun to think about it though.

First off, you didn't clear anything up with that "crack" statement which I found zero humor in. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-frown.gif[/img]

Second, I merely asked Why Sac would do this trade. Now what makes you think I'm on crack for saying that?? [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img]

Quote:

What do we really need? Needs prioritized:

1. A 7' Center who is muscular, athletic enough to be a fiend on the boards, and can move his feet to play defense, be a shot-blocking threat

Which we've got on a 10-day contract but a certain fat moron of a coach wouldn't give him the time of day. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-mad.gif[/img]

Quote:

2. Ridding ourselves of Antoine Walker

Good luck. I'd be very surprised if Walker is not re-signed to this dallas squad in the offseason.

If Cuban trades Walker then he's admitted that he made a so-called "mistake" in trading for him....something his Ego won't let him do.

Quote:

3. A backup point-guard who can fill it up - handle and score

No such Player. It's either a Shoot-first PG or Pass-First PG.

Quote:

4. A leader to emerge

That should be Finley's department but Dirk should be the one.

Quote:

5. A coach not on crack.

I wonder if he's smoking the same brand that I am? [img]i/expressions/rolleye.gif[/img]

jimmychipwood · 01-13-2004, 01:10 PM

MT, glad you saw some humor in my comments, if not at the beginning, at least at the end of your reply.

You know I'm joking with you MT, it's fun for you to kind of be a nemesis, since I (and most people, like ESPN radio) don't like Walker's game, and you (and a few others) would fall on a sword for Walker.