 |
|
12-20-2009, 10:52 PM
|
#11 |
|
Lazy Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
  |
I understand not giving an injury prone guy like Nick Johnson 5+ mil.
I do NOT understand giving Darren Oliver 3+ mil. Darren Oliver, for some reason, was always one of my favorite Rangers in the late 90's. And he's definitely been effective against lefties in relief. But are we really paying 3+ mil for, essentially, a LOOGY? Does this mean they're really serious about moving CJ to the rotation? And if that's the case, are you moving a couple people out? Because right now you could say the rotation is a bit crowded. I just don't understand. Edit: I guess I shouldn't pigeon-hole Oliver as a LOOGY. He's been pretty effective against all hitters out of the Angel pen. I just don't understand putting money toward the bullpen when you're this cash strapped. There must be a trade coming.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions) Mavs Net Ratings By Game (Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com Last edited by jthig32; 12-20-2009 at 11:03 PM. |
|
|
| Tags |
| back on da scene, it's over, shut the fluff up, tag wasting, with tha fluffy lean |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Threaded Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.