Would you do Al Harrington for Josh?

[MavsWiLLHaVeRinGs]

Golden State: They are desperate for frontcourt scoring and with the injury to Monta Ellis are desperate for any kind of scoring. They'd love to rid themselves of Al Harrington ($9.2 million this year, $10.02 million next season), who comes off the books in time for 2010. Walsh had Harrington in Indiana and though he does fit into the up-tempo style, he can be a maddening player to deal with on a daily basis. The Knicks would have to take another player to make the numbers match, which means another contract to throw on the pile. Newsday

The article is talking about the Knicks trying to acquire him, but I just thought it may be an idea for us too. Salaries are very similar. But Josh may be the better player (or is he?) Both can be a headache, thoughts?

p.s. I realize the F.O. wouldn't do it, they seem to stick by Josh regardless of what he does, but I"m just asking if you think they SHOULD do it if the opportunity was there. We need a player who won't fade in the clutch.