12-02-2011, 12:54 PM
|
#481
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,863
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluid.forty.one
saw this on Fish's site. Apparently Terry has been trying to talk TC into staying
"I've spoken to him every day for the last two weeks and he wants to be here, he wants to be a Maverick next year," Said Terry, adding that their conversations were the purpose of "recruiting." "Now, it's on ownership to make it happen."
|
Lets hope he's talking him into taking one for the team....home town discount. Can the guy realistically get 15 million over 4 years on the open market?
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 01:07 PM
|
#482
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Under the new CBA, can't the Mavs still offer Chandler one more year than any other team?
Instead of $15m/4 years, couldn't we do $12m/5 years? He'd still earn $60m, but he'd count $3m less per year against the cap...
(not that we'd want to do that, but isn't it possible under the new rules?)
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 12-02-2011 at 01:11 PM.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 01:13 PM
|
#483
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Robot Hell, NJ
Posts: 9,574
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kidd Karma
My followup question to the CBA would be, so can Orlando amnestize Arenas, since they were traded prior to the new CBA, but Arenas signed the contract with the Wizards.
|
He means players acquired via trade post lockout. So the Magic can't amnesty Arenas then trade Hedo to a team that will amnesty him.
__________________
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 01:40 PM
|
#484
|
Lazy Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
Under the new CBA, can't the Mavs still offer Chandler one more year than any other team?
Instead of $15m/4 years, couldn't we do $12m/5 years? He'd still earn $60m, but he'd count $3m less per year against the cap...
(not that we'd want to do that, but isn't it possible under the new rules?)
|
Yes
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 01:50 PM
|
#485
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
Under the new CBA, can't the Mavs still offer Chandler one more year than any other team?
Instead of $15m/4 years, couldn't we do $12m/5 years? He'd still earn $60m, but he'd count $3m less per year against the cap...
(not that we'd want to do that, but isn't it possible under the new rules?)
|
I just don't see how Chandler is "worth" more than Terry or Kidd to the Mavs...esp with the new CBA. Granted Chandler filled a hole the Mavs had, but without Kidd or Terry an equally big hole exists. 9.5M/year for 4 years with max raises would be my final offer.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 01:57 PM
|
#486
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,863
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
Under the new CBA, can't the Mavs still offer Chandler one more year than any other team?
Instead of $15m/4 years, couldn't we do $12m/5 years? He'd still earn $60m, but he'd count $3m less per year against the cap...
(not that we'd want to do that, but isn't it possible under the new rules?)
|
Yea, but does Cuban/Nelson want to. The Damp Chip was to chase, Lebron/Bosh, it failed, they added an expiring in Chandler, maybe they just added him as a place holder to bridge them into a possible trade, or they will just eat the cap space for the 2012 class of Howard, Williams or Paul. There's 2 ways to look at it, bring Tyson back at your price,(4 years 10 million per) or save the cap space for 2012, which means Tyson gets a fat 1 year offer.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 01:58 PM
|
#487
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinylstar
I just don't see how Chandler is "worth" more than Terry or Kidd to the Mavs...esp with the new CBA. Granted Chandler filled a hole the Mavs had, but without Kidd or Terry an equally big hole exists. 9.5M/year for 4 years with max raises would be my final offer.
|
Kidd born 1973, height 6-4
Terry born 1977, height 6-2
Chandler born 1982, height 7-1
Hope that helps clarify things...
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 12-02-2011 at 02:06 PM.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 02:10 PM
|
#488
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,863
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinylstar
I just don't see how Chandler is "worth" more than Terry or Kidd to the Mavs...esp with the new CBA. Granted Chandler filled a hole the Mavs had, but without Kidd or Terry an equally big hole exists. 9.5M/year for 4 years with max raises would be my final offer.
|
This is way to subjective. You going to give Terry and Kidd, the same offer you giving to Chandler, 4 years 10 million? No, due to age. They are all at different points of their careers. Without Terry, we don't win, now if you move Terry add Fernandez, do you win last year? Same with Kidd you take Kidd out for say Bibby, do you win? No of course not, these players provided skill sets, that meshed at the right time and all helped us to win the prize. Like I've said before, Cuban has expressed publicly before that each player has a value to his team, economically he wouldn't overpay with free agent signings. Chandler is known and has proven that he's the top help defender out there, but his on ball defense is lacking, his individual offensive skills do not exist, so do you pay him 14+ a year? Economically irresponsible. Do you offer him a bit more because he "fits your team," sure, but what's his value to Cuban? 10 million? Does Cuban sacrifice 4 years to win now? Or does he stick with his plan to eat the cap space and wait for 2012? Its not an great position to be in, almost like the Nash spot.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 02:45 PM
|
#489
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinylstar
I just don't see how Chandler is "worth" more than Terry or Kidd to the Mavs...esp with the new CBA. Granted Chandler filled a hole the Mavs had, but without Kidd or Terry an equally big hole exists. 9.5M/year for 4 years with max raises would be my final offer.
|
Others have (rightly) pointed out that the fact that TC is a center is one reason that he might be worth more. Nonetheless, I suspect your thinking isn't too far off from the Mavs' thinking. For all the noise Mark and Rick made about Tyson deserving a spot on the all-star team last season, most people, I think, can see that he's simply not that caliber of player. What he does well, he does extremely well, but he's still a fairly average man defender in the post, and he's very limited offensively, with a game that is extremely dependent on his athleticism (making his age less of a factor in setting his worth apart from iron-man JET's, for example). The Mavs' front office is well aware of his limitations, and they have an established history of shying away from giving contracts that average anything over 10 million per year to anybody who's not a legitimate all-star talent. I suspect that they are indeed balancing their desire to position themselves as title favorites this year by paying him market value against the reality that, when you look past the position he plays, he probably isn't worth that much more than Kidd or JET on a per-season basis.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 03:35 PM
|
#490
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,662
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
Kidd born 1973, height 6-4
Terry born 1977, height 6-2
Chandler born 1982, height 7-1
Hope that helps clarify things...
|
Yep, No one born in the '70s is over 7 feet.
__________________
you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 06:01 PM
|
#491
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
LOL, $20mil/year would make Chandler the 5th-highest paid player in the league, $18.75mil/year would make him the 7th-highest (and we're talking about pre-CBA salaries here).
Go for it, Golden State - one less team to compete with for the next 4 years...
|
wait what? golden state aren't "competing" right now
__________________
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 08:13 PM
|
#492
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
Hmm GS did that,,then could Dallas go get Biedrins?? Because I would be all for that.
__________________
77
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 08:18 PM
|
#493
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 5,502
|
Just say NO to Biedrins, I was lurking on a Warriors forum sometime last month and they were all complaining that Biedrins no longer wants to play basketball. They said Andris said in an interview that he wants to retire early and go back to his home of Latvia. The kid has lost all motivation, which pretty much explains his disappointing play as of late. Idk though maybe a change of scenery can help him, but that's a big risk.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 08:26 PM
|
#494
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,255
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AO41
Hmm GS did that,,then could Dallas go get Biedrins?? Because I would be all for that.
|
Dallas would want the 3 years 27 million remaining on his contract? I don't think so...
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 08:38 PM
|
#495
|
Guru
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,016
|
You guys realize that chandler is somewhere between the 40-70th best player in basketball right.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 08:44 PM
|
#496
|
Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cowboys Country
Posts: 23,336
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-ofan
You guys realize that chandler is somewhere between the 40-70th best player in basketball right.
|
Is that "best," or "most valuable?" Or is there not a difference?
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 09:01 PM
|
#497
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 40,410
|
And he's more valuable to some than others.
__________________
"Yankees fans who say “flags fly forever’’ are right, you never lose that. It reinforces all the good things about being a fan. ... It’s black and white. You (the Mavs) won a title. That’s it and no one can say s--- about it.’’
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 09:30 PM
|
#498
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,255
|
Who gets the vibe that Tyson really wants to be a Maverick?
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 09:36 PM
|
#499
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
As long as we're splitting semantic hairs here, I'd argue that "most valuable" is a far more fickle thing than "best". If a player's value transcends his talent, it necessarily does so contextually. Change the context, and that value can come crashing back down to earth in a hurry.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 10:11 PM
|
#500
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
I really like Tyson a lot and I always thought that we needed a center like him or Camby when he was a bit younger next to Dirk...but I am getting a litte tired of people giving Tyson soo much of the credit for the title run....he had his moments, but so did almost every player on the team.
I have said it before....IMO 10-11 million a year...maybe. Anything more, I dont go for it. I will trust that Mark and the front office will get something done if Tyson leaves.
__________________
77
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 10:17 PM
|
#501
|
Guru
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,016
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chumdawg
Is that "best," or "most valuable?" Or is there not a difference?
|
For him its both.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 10:18 PM
|
#502
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,511
|
Quote:
In the meantime, here's a little teaser: The amount of money every NBA team can and will spend far exceeds the collective talent (both for quantity and quality). In other words … gentleman, start your dumb contract engines!!!! Who's ready to be overpaid??? Step right up! Who's first?
(It's almost like the lockout never happened. Almost.)
|
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/...-nba-christmas
He's right on the money. Chandler will get more than he deserves, so will Butler. Oh and Stevenson wants a multi-year? Sure … but somewhere else. JJB seems the only one right now who tries to play it fair.
Weak FA-class + Teams that, in some cases, even HAVE to spend = Overpaying.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 10:20 PM
|
#503
|
Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cowboys Country
Posts: 23,336
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndmstr_c
As long as we're splitting semantic hairs here, I'd argue that "most valuable" is a far more fickle thing than "best". If a player's value transcends his talent, it necessarily does so contextually. Change the context, and that value can come crashing back down to earth in a hurry.
|
Yes, but of course there is a flip side to that coin. Your own team could swap a player for a more talented one and see the competitive product suffer.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 10:35 PM
|
#504
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chumdawg
Yes, but of course there is a flip side to that coin. Your own team could swap a player for a more talented one and see the competitive product suffer.
|
Obviously. That's beside the point when it comes to Tyson, though. Unless you think the players Dallas is planning on chasing next summer if they end up with cap room are going to be bad fits.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 10:53 PM
|
#505
|
Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cowboys Country
Posts: 23,336
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndmstr_c
Obviously. That's beside the point when it comes to Tyson, though. Unless you think the players Dallas is planning on chasing next summer if they end up with cap room are going to be bad fits.
|
I don't know what the answer to that is (nor am I certain it would be relevant), but I do think that Chandler is a very good fit.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 10:58 PM
|
#506
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 40,410
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndmstr_c
As long as we're splitting semantic hairs here, I'd argue that "most valuable" is a far more fickle thing than "best". If a player's value transcends his talent, it necessarily does so contextually. Change the context, and that value can come crashing back down to earth in a hurry.
|
Agreed... Tyson playing for the Phoenix suns under dantoni would not have been nearly the same impact. But that almost makes the case to overpay ty.
__________________
"Yankees fans who say “flags fly forever’’ are right, you never lose that. It reinforces all the good things about being a fan. ... It’s black and white. You (the Mavs) won a title. That’s it and no one can say s--- about it.’’
Last edited by dude1394; 12-02-2011 at 11:02 PM.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 11:07 PM
|
#507
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,511
|
Quote:
According to sources, Nene, Chandler and Gasol all set their early asking prices in the neighborhood of maximum-contract territory, starting at $14.8 million for Gasol, $17.7 annually for Nene, and $20.7 million for Chandler. There is plenty of crossover in their respective lists of salary-cap-friendly suitors, with the Nets, Rockets and Warriors appearing to be the hungriest shoppers, and the Pacers and Trail Blazers strolling the big man aisles as well.
Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz1fRPZIYOT
|
I shit my pants if somebody pays Chandler more than Nene.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 11:21 PM
|
#508
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
Kidd born 1973, height 6-4
Terry born 1977, height 6-2
Chandler born 1982, height 7-1
Hope that helps clarify things...
|
But if you stand Terry on Kidds shoulders they would equal about 11' 6".
All kidding aside what people seem to have forgotten is that TC as a top help defender ( his strength) mitigates Kidds and Terry's defensive libilities. Unless you replace him with an equal help defender they will hurt you on defense which is the problem Dallas had before he got here. His skill set is not as valuable to another team as it is to the Mavs but with out him Terry and Kidd are libilities. They need TC to be effective on the floor. Kidd is getting older and Terry had a good playoff but will he ever have another? Also without JB the guards still couldn't penitrate last year. Both Kidd and Terry are incomplete guards who need the right pieces around them to be effective. If you lose TC you will also need to think about replacing either Kidd or Terry.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 11:24 PM
|
#509
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
I will LOL if Tyson gets more money from someone than Nene or Gasol. Aagain I like Tyson..but he is NOT a max guy...10-11 millions tops.
__________________
77
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 11:38 PM
|
#510
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chumdawg
I don't know what the answer to that is (nor am I certain it would be relevant), but I do think that Chandler is a very good fit.
|
I agree that he's a good fit. But I also think that a big part of the reason he's such a good fit is the rather unusual composition of the Dallas backcourt. If I thought Dallas could count on the Kidd/JET duo as their go-to backcourt for the next three seasons I'd be more on board with the value/fit argument for re-signing Chandler, but I just don't believe that's realistic.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 11:40 PM
|
#511
|
Golden Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mesquite, Texas
Posts: 1,403
|
While I would prefer a guy like Chandler at center I have to agree with what others have said. He is not a guy you want to be paying the max though I'm sure some team would pay for him.
__________________
Last edited by Mavsfan4ever; 12-02-2011 at 11:41 PM.
|
|
|
12-02-2011, 11:41 PM
|
#512
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dude1394
Agreed... Tyson playing for the Phoenix suns under dantoni would not have been nearly the same impact. But that almost makes the case to overpay ty.
|
I actually think just the opposite, and give the reason in my response to CD just above.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 12:01 AM
|
#513
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevinHarriswillstart
Who gets the vibe that Tyson really wants to be a Maverick?
|
I think Tyson really wants to be a Maverick, but cashing in on a career season should (rightfully) be his biggest priority. Maybe he lives up to the contract, maybe he doesn't - he gets paid either way.
But then again, he's already made $80m in his career - maybe he's the type of guy who would sacrifice a ~$20m in a $120-140m career as long as he has a legitimate shot at winning another ring or two? Maybe, who knows?
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 12-03-2011 at 12:05 AM.
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 12:31 AM
|
#514
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 11,831
|
20 million...I love you Chandler, and your hard nosed defense, but Dallas will survive not giving up a contract like that. Asinine. Hope you land somewhere you like.
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 01:14 AM
|
#515
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
Kidd born 1973, height 6-4
Terry born 1977, height 6-2
Chandler born 1982, height 7-1
Hope that helps clarify things...
|
It doesn't. People should be paid in terms of production exclusively. I don't care if JKidd is 50...pay him based on what he contributes.
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 01:17 AM
|
#516
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,511
|
Getting a little confused right now. Obviously Mavs could resign Ty with Bird Exception, but then would most certainly went over the Tax threshold and couldn't use the Full MLE. Butler and JJB are also Bird Agents, so why not spend the MLE first and then resign all your Bird Agents? Is there a certain "order" that you have to keep?
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 01:19 AM
|
#517
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 40,410
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by j0Shi
I shit my pants if somebody pays Chandler more than Nene.
|
According to sources, Nene, Chandler and Gasol all set their early asking prices in the neighborhood of maximum-contract territory, starting at $14.8 million for Gasol, $17.7 annually for Nene, and $20.7 million for Chandler. There is plenty of crossover in their respective lists of salary-cap-friendly suitors, with the Nets, Rockets and Warriors appearing to be the hungriest shoppers, and the Pacers and Trail Blazers strolling the big man aisles as well.
Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz1fRPZIYOT
Who set the early asking price themselves!! They'll get a comeuppance quick enough.
__________________
"Yankees fans who say “flags fly forever’’ are right, you never lose that. It reinforces all the good things about being a fan. ... It’s black and white. You (the Mavs) won a title. That’s it and no one can say s--- about it.’’
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 04:49 AM
|
#518
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 2,209
|
This is a joke, none of them worth max money, but especially not Chandler. What is he thinking? He's an excellent one way role player but not a guy who you even think to pay the max to. Especially with his injury history, and reputation as "contract year" guy. Nobody can be that stupid to give him a 20 million dollar contract, nobody. Not a chance. So, are we looking at Dalembert now? He's actually kinda similar to Tyson, and put up 8/8 in 24 (!) minutes last year, had a 10/10 season, and is actually a 12/11/2,6 block per36 player career wise. He would put up 12/10/2,5 PER 36 on our team, and maybe not quite the team defender Tyson is, but still a very good one, he would give a different look than Haywood.
Last edited by Budapest Maverick; 12-03-2011 at 04:54 AM.
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 05:42 AM
|
#519
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,082
|
My guess is he ends up with someone like Houston, a team he wont put over the top, for something like $15-$17mil/year. I think we're saying goodbye to Ty.
I dont really blame Donnie and Cubes for not signing him for that much.
|
|
|
12-03-2011, 07:35 AM
|
#520
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: POLAND
Posts: 1,551
|
For me Tyson Chandler is one of the best C in the league.And he is worth every money.I don't want know what will happen when Tyson go.
__________________
No one loves Dirk any more than I do
MY HEART-WHERE DIRK NOWITZKI IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE AN ALL-STAR
Last edited by 41mvp; 12-03-2011 at 07:38 AM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.
|