Mapes liberal bias shines through....Kerry link.

[Drbio]

NEW YORK (AP) - The fallout from CBS's doomed story about President Bush's National Guard service most endangers a woman few viewers know but who played a key role in two of the biggest television stories of the year.

Mary Mapes, a veteran producer at CBS News, reported most of the National Guard story, including obtaining the documents CBS now says it can't authenticate. She also passed on the phone number of her source, former Texas National Guard officer Bill Burkett, to the Kerry campaign.

Mapes, 48, was described by colleagues on Tuesday as a dogged and talented journalist who made no secret of her liberal political beliefs.

She's only a few months removed from a career-defining highlight. Mapes took a story that had received little attention - the abuse of prisoners by American soldiers in Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison - and unearthed the photos that gave the story its visceral impact.

"She pursued stories very aggressively always," said Jeff Fager, executive producer of "60 Minutes.""She definitely has an investigative sense. She was responsible for the bulk of the work on Abu Ghraib. That was her story."

The Dallas-based producer, who declined through a spokeswoman to talk with The Associated Press, also landed the first TV interviews with Strom Thurmond's biracial daughter and Hillary Rodham Clinton after her husband's impeachment. Mapes was almost jailed in 1999 for refusing a judge's order to turn over a videotape of Dan Rather's interview with a white man convicted of killing a black man by dragging him behind a pickup truck.

She worked at Seattle's KIRO-TV before coming to CBS in 1989. In the "60 Minutes" tradition, producers like Mapes wield tremendous influence on the stories and operate with a great deal of independence - a status earned after many years of proving themselves, Fager said.

John Carlson, a former commentator at KIRO-TV who is host of a conservative radio talk show in Seattle, remembers Mapes as a talented producer with whom he often argued politics in the newsroom.

Mapes was "quite liberal" and disliked the current President Bush's father, he said.

"She definitely was someone who was motivated by what she cared about and definitely went into journalism to make a difference," Carlson said. "She's not the sort of person who went into journalism to report the news and offer an array of commentary."

Carlson spoke with Mapes about the National Guard story a week ago, and said that he believes she "put so much time into it that she wanted something to come of it."

"This was a woman with a good reputation," he said. "The mistakes she made were so obvious. This was a story that was rushed because they clearly believed it was true. They wanted it to be true."

Rather acknowledged Monday that Burkett didn't come to CBS. The network approached him about the documents, knowing he had been trying for several years to discredit President Bush's military service record, he said.

In a USA Today story, Burkett said he agreed to turn documents impugning Bush's service - widely considered now to be fake - over to CBS on the condition CBS would help arrange a conversation with the Kerry campaign. Burkett's lawyer, Gabe Quintanilla, said he could not immediately confirm that Tuesday.

CBS acknowledged Mapes passed on Burkett's number to Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart, and Lockhart called him. Spokeswoman Kelli Edwards said CBS wasn't aware that this was part of any deal, but it's one of the things that will be examined by an independent commission CBS will soon appoint to look into the incident.

"It is obviously against CBS News standards and those of every other reputable news organization to be associated with any political agenda," Edwards said.

It had to be tempting: get key documents you've long been seeking to nail down a story, and all you had to do was set up a phone call.

Still, it's a lapse in journalistic ethics if true, said Marvin Kalb, senior fellow at Harvard University's Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy.

"Journalists do all kinds of odd things these days to get a news story," Kalb said, "but one of the things they should not be doing is paying the price of a political contact."

It's particularly damaging when news coverage is being scrutinized by both sides of a bitter political divide, said Frank Sesno, former CNN Washington bureau chief and professor at George Mason University. Even before this story, Rather and CBS News were targets of groups concerned about an anti-Republican bias in the media.

The Lockhart contact "is going to cast more doubt on not just the practices, but the motives behind the story," Sesno said.

"She's done many, many solid stories in her career," Fager said. "How this went so horribly wrong is a mystery to many of us and I look forward to hearing the details."

[LRB]

"She's done many, many solid stories in her career," Fager said. "How this went so horribly wrong is a mystery to many of us and I look forward to hearing the details."

That's easy, she like Dan Rather is nothing more than a partisan tool. If Mapes along with Rather and the president of CBS News aren't fired, then it's impossible for CBS to retain any shred of credibility. The National Equirer will have more than an order of magnitude of credibility over CBS.

[MavKikiNYC]

Whether Mapes's story is typical or not for mainstream journalists (and I suspect it's a helluva lot more typical than not), it will feed (nay veritably cram down the public's throat) the perception that jouranlists, and mainstream media are politically biased to the point of corruption, and cannot be trusted.

This is the worst kind of journalistic abuse, the worst kind of story that could come out for a major meida entity like CBS--that some influential behind-the-scenes former and shaper of opinion, manipulates not only HOW facts are presented, but WHICH facts are presented, and HOW FACTUAL some of the "facts" are.

There has to be some accountability. The public doesn't get to vote directly for these kinds of people--the Rathers, the Mapes, the Jennings, et al. We just have to endure them until their ideological arrogance leads them to an utter disregard for truth or any semblance whatsoever of journalistic objetivity or integrity. When a fraud that has been been so brazenly foisted onto the public is uncovered, a price has to be paid.

For c-BS to have any chance at all of eventually rehabilitating its journalistic credibility, both Mapes AND Rather have to be fired, have to be sent away in disgrace, their careers as 'objective' journalists have to be publically terminated. Not just Mapes, mind you. Don't throw her to the wolves of accountability while trying to save Dan Rather as a component of the c-BS brand. No good ol' boy treatment for Dan Rather. No-phuckin'-sir. Fire them. Fire them both. Fire them publically, categorically, and absolutely. No nudging Dan Rather off into some sort of Editor Emeritus position at CBS, while the CBS brass rolls its eyes behind his back at the public, as if to say, "Good Old Uncle Dan--what're we gonna do?"

If Martha Stewart's lapse in judgment is going to cost her jail time (not to mention millions of $$ in net worth) then surely, surely this far more egregious änd intentional "lapse in judgement" should be worth a couple of careers.


Memo to c-BS: Save yourself. Save your network. Have security come in during tonight's broadcast and haul Dan Rather's decrepit, Liberal, lying ass right off the set. Film it. Escort him to the sidewalk in front of the studio with his personal effects in a banker's box and show the world the cost of hijacking a network news program simply to promote one's own patho-political agenda. If you could gently leak that this was going to happen to the blogosphere a few minutes in advance of broadcast, your news ratings would set alltime records for viewership, and you would have taken a giant step toward re-establishing credibility with the public. Anything less will leave your network forever tainted as a mere third-rate PR operation for the ideologically insolvent Democratic party.