Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > General Mavs Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-16-2012, 09:55 PM   #10
ribosoma
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greater Nowheres
Posts: 1,189
ribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond reputeribosoma has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by |_Jeff_| View Post
Consider the trade deadline next season. Mavs wouldn't be able to move Haywood with two seasons and $15M left. But an expiring $8M is attractive to potential trade partners. Kaman's contract will become a trade chip and that is why he's here.
And the reason why the Mavs wouldn't be able to move Haywood's contract is...

wait for it...

because he absolutely sucked last year and was replaced by a completely inexperienced, undersized project player.

If the Mavs and the rest of the league thought that Haywood was equal to or better than Kaman (which, I am fairly certain, was your original point), wouldn't they have held onto him?

Last edited by ribosoma; 07-16-2012 at 09:59 PM.
ribosoma is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
haywood>kaman=loltarded, hulkamania, jefftakeshaywooddeep, kaman debunked, love guns, skip bayliss = underdog


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.