Quote:
Originally Posted by |_Jeff_|
Consider the trade deadline next season. Mavs wouldn't be able to move Haywood with two seasons and $15M left. But an expiring $8M is attractive to potential trade partners. Kaman's contract will become a trade chip and that is why he's here.
|
And the reason why the Mavs wouldn't be able to move Haywood's contract is...
wait for it...
because he absolutely sucked last year and was replaced by a completely inexperienced, undersized project player.
If the Mavs and the rest of the league thought that Haywood was equal to or better than Kaman (which, I am fairly certain, was your original point), wouldn't they have held onto him?