Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > General Mavs Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2020, 07:29 PM   #1
rimrocker
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,458
rimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond reputerimrocker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I tend to agree with Steven A. but Mavs have several months to prove him wrong.
Clips definitely have the stars and a good supporting cast and on paper I don't think there is any question they are better than Mavs.

I do not agree with him that it isn't even close. Mavs have the upside to get incredibly better to compete with them and Clips are right there as far as I'm concerned. If I remember correctly the Mavs were damn close to winning 2 of the Lakers games and if healthy and another year under their belt, they should be that much better. Mavs superstar is another year closer to prime, Lakers superstar is another year further from prime. The big difference is KP vs AD. Mavs will close on that gap as Luka matures and LeBron fades, the question is how long that will take.

Last edited by rimrocker; 11-25-2020 at 07:33 PM.
rimrocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2020, 11:26 PM   #2
GQ2003
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 41
GQ2003 is just really niceGQ2003 is just really niceGQ2003 is just really niceGQ2003 is just really niceGQ2003 is just really niceGQ2003 is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rimrocker View Post
I tend to agree with Steven A. but Mavs have several months to prove him wrong.
Clips definitely have the stars and a good supporting cast and on paper I don't think there is any question they are better than Mavs.

I do not agree with him that it isn't even close. Mavs have the upside to get incredibly better to compete with them and Clips are right there as far as I'm concerned. If I remember correctly the Mavs were damn close to winning 2 of the Lakers games and if healthy and another year under their belt, they should be that much better. Mavs superstar is another year closer to prime, Lakers superstar is another year further from prime. The big difference is KP vs AD. Mavs will close on that gap as Luka matures and LeBron fades, the question is how long that will take.
I could be wrong but I think the gap between the mavs and clippers has definitely been closed. The reason we struggled so much with the Clippers and their Eastern conference doppelganger (Boston) and even the Knicks for that matter is because we had no playable wings outside of DFS. Our offseason additions make us a completely different team. The Clippers lost Harrell, Jamychal Green and Landry Shamet but added Kennard and Ibaka. I imagine the Clippers aren't done but I look at them about the same as last year.

The mavs lost Curry and non-contributors like Wright, Jackson & MKG while adding Richardson, Johnson, Iwundu, Brunson, Powell, WCS and KP to the group that pushed them to 6 games in the bubble. That's not even mentioning the rookies. If they gel under Carlisle and stay healthy, I definitely don't see them as better than us. I see both teams about the same but Dallas has better coaching and young talent that will get better with time.
GQ2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.