Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Everything Else > Political Arena

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2009, 01:41 PM   #1
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aquaadverse View Post
I wonder if they realize what a can of worms filing the suit opens up. There will be some serious squirming under discovery.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

Maybe the two ex-employees have a case. You'd think they'd have a case against ACORN as well, since the firing (not to mention the training they received) no doubt contributed to the "extreme emotional distress"
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 07:53 PM   #2
aquaadverse
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 317
aquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to allaquaadverse is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Usually Lurkin View Post
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

Maybe the two ex-employees have a case. You'd think they'd have a case against ACORN as well, since the firing (not to mention the training they received) no doubt contributed to the "extreme emotional distress"
But it automatically tosses all manner of legal muscle into forcing people to testify under oath by rules of discovery. Pretty stupid on their part. They should have scurried away from the light and reformed as another group like all the other organizations do. Given our national attention span, they could be back up vacuuming USDA swag by New Years Day under a name like Tulip Bulb or Pine Cone.
This won't end well for them.
aquaadverse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 11:01 PM   #3
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aquaadverse View Post
But it automatically tosses all manner of legal muscle into forcing people to testify under oath by rules of discovery. Pretty stupid on their part. They should have scurried away from the light and reformed as another group like all the other organizations do. Given our national attention span, they could be back up vacuuming USDA swag by New Years Day under a name like Tulip Bulb or Pine Cone.
This won't end well for them.
yeah. I can't imagine why they are doing it other than they really believe they are in the right, and in a defensible position (that's a stretch, considering they've been firing the people involved), or they're trying to keep the tapes out of court or something (as illegally obtained evidence?).
I really think, though, that their sense of entitlement is so strong, they don't know the difference between right and wrong.
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 11:43 PM   #4
Flacolaco
Rooting for the laundry
 
Flacolaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 21,342
Flacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond reputeFlacolaco has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Usually Lurkin View Post
I really think, though, that their sense of entitlement is so strong, they don't know the difference between right and wrong.
You just described about 53% of voters last year.
__________________
Flacolaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 06:10 AM   #5
92bDad
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 2,505
92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future92bDad has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flacolaco View Post
You just described about 53% of voters last year.
You must spread some rep before giving it to Flaco again!!!
92bDad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cuethecrickets, ex fluff the president, fluff on words, fluffy banter, fluffy screaming, larry craig is gay, liberals are gay


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.