Quote:
Originally Posted by rmacomic
Perhaps our deffinition of volume shooter differs, but if I see a bench player regularly shooting more than any starter, I see a volume shooter. Yes, VC has been shooting well lately, but he has had several stretches this season where we have all screamed for him to stop shooting the ball every time down the damn court.
I am not the only person who has voiced this complaint. I hate that this team is so determined to move away from the guy who took us to our only championship.
|
I too have consistently voiced a complaint about his having too quick a trigger finger on certain threes--which is absolutely true. I wish he wouldn't shoot deep threes the second he touches the ball. But he is not a "volume shooter." I'm not sure what definition you could be using, but "volume shooter" means one thing: guy who shoots a lot
and shoots a low percentage.
Neither of those things applies to Carter. He averages 10.4 shots per game, which is not a high number at all in an absolute sense. It's third-highest on the team, well below both Dirk and Mayo (13.4 each). If he "regularly" shoots more than all five starters, as you claim, how does he average three fewer shots per game than two of the five?
His shooting percentage isn't absurdly good (44%), but it's very good from three (41%) and, as noted, his TS% and eFG% are both exceptional. I'm not sure why you would call TS% a "gimmick stat." It's not win-shares, single-game plus-minus, PER, or some other weird composite stat that arguably doesn't mean anything. TS% is a very, very reliable indicator of a player's efficiency.
Strange thing is, I think we actually share the same main complaint about Carter. It grinds my gears sometimes how little of a shot conscience he has. But he's a pretty damn efficient bench player, far from a "volume shooter." To me, it sounds like your complaint is really with the coaching strategy of using Vince instead of Dirk for late-game possessions. Fair enough. I'm inclined to agree, though I'm pretty sure there are reasons for it. But even still, that's not Vince's fault, and it has nothing to do with him being an inefficient player.