07-06-2009, 10:55 PM
|
#1
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jthig32
One nice thing about this..we will know tomorrow or Wednesday at the very latest if it's going to happen or not. Whereas we have to wait another 9 gays for the Gortat thing to be official.
So let's assume this goes through, Gortat is here, Kidd signs, and the plan is to roll with Marion/Josh as your 2/3. Assume some sort of filler is sent in the trade, but not Wright.
What do you want from the LLE?
|
If Marion comes I really don't see a place for Bass, but I want to keep Singleton. Hopefully that doesn't require the LLE.
I'm fine with Josh/Marion as the starting 2/3, and a defensive option like Ross is a nice guy to have on the bench. It'd sure be nice if there was a way to get Parker and Marion in the prospective S&T. I think I'd want to save the LLE for next year in that case.
Assuming no Parker and Singleton doesn't cost the LLE, I still think a SG with good size and an offensive game would be nice to have. That brings me back to Wafer.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 10:58 PM
|
#2
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndmstr_c
If Marion comes I really don't see a place for Bass, but I want to keep Singleton. Hopefully that doesn't require the LLE.
I'm fine with Josh/Marion as the starting 2/3, and a defensive option like Ross is a nice guy to have on the bench. It'd sure be nice if there was a way to get Parker and Marion in the prospective S&T. I think I'd want to save the LLE for next year in that case.
Assuming no Parker and Singleton doesn't cost the LLE, I still think a SG with good size and an offensive game would be nice to have. That brings me back to Wafer.
|
I'm no CBA expert, but if I'm not mistaken, we have Early Bird Rights for Singleton and wouldn't have to use the LLE. There's a decent chance I have no idea what I'm saying.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 10:58 PM
|
#3
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndmstr_c
If Marion comes I really don't see a place for Bass, but I want to keep Singleton. Hopefully that doesn't require the LLE.
I'm fine with Josh/Marion as the starting 2/3, and a defensive option like Ross is a nice guy to have on the bench. It'd sure be nice if there was a way to get Parker and Marion in the prospective S&T. I think I'd want to save the LLE for next year in that case.
Assuming no Parker and Singleton doesn't cost the LLE, I still think a SG with good size and an offensive game would be nice to have. That brings me back to Wafer.
|
I don't think Singleton will be an issue to retain, I think Hollins should be ok too.
Any interest in Barnes? SF backup, has some range and can still D up a bit.
I think minutes might be hard to come by because you have shift Josh to SG and most of those minutes will be up with Josh and Jet. Ross is good insurance for defense and etc. I think there will be available minutes because I have a feeling Wright is getting dealt.
LLE is not available year to year, correct? So if we didn't use it, then we'd still have it next year, but if we use it, it's gone til 2011...that's what you're saying?
Last edited by BGMaverick9; 07-06-2009 at 11:00 PM.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:01 PM
|
#4
|
Lazy Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndmstr_c
If Marion comes I really don't see a place for Bass, but I want to keep Singleton. Hopefully that doesn't require the LLE.
I'm fine with Josh/Marion as the starting 2/3, and a defensive option like Ross is a nice guy to have on the bench. It'd sure be nice if there was a way to get Parker and Marion in the prospective S&T. I think I'd want to save the LLE for next year in that case.
Assuming no Parker and Singleton doesn't cost the LLE, I still think a SG with good size and an offensive game would be nice to have. That brings me back to Wafer.
|
96 minutes at the 2/3 position.
Say Marion plays 25 minutes at SF (10 at PF).
Josh plays 35 minutes, all at SF/SG.
Jet plays 30ish minutes at SG.
Where do minutes for a backup SG come from?
I honestly think I'd hang onto the LLE given what we know of the roster right now (assuming the trade goes through).
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:03 PM
|
#5
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jthig32
96 minutes at the 2/3 position.
Say Marion plays 25 minutes at SF (10 at PF).
Josh plays 35 minutes, all at SF/SG.
Jet plays 30ish minutes at SG.
Where do minutes for a backup SG come from?
I honestly think I'd hang onto the LLE given what we know of the roster right now (assuming the trade goes through).
|
Parker and Jet can play a little together
edit: But for how long? Doubt they package Parker with him anyways. No to SG off bench, BTW I am of impression if need be Barnes can play a few minutes at the 4 as well as the 2
Last edited by mavs777; 07-06-2009 at 11:06 PM.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:08 PM
|
#6
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jthig32
I honestly think I'd hang onto the LLE given what we know of the roster right now (assuming the trade goes through).
|
If Wright sticks, I can definitely see that as perhaps the best choice. It could always be used later if somebody more compelling comes along.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.
|