Quote:
Originally posted by: dude1394
It was divinley inspired.
|
You know, Dude, I think you made a very prescient comment here. That was very much the prevalent element in that speech. I was struck by it--almost taken aback, really. It was what I would call unabashed.
Though I may not personally be on the same page with Bush or the Religious Right in these matters, I very much respect them. It can't do much harm, if any, and it stands to do a whole lot of good. I have a tremendous amount of respect in their convictions, and I tend to think that the avenue they walk is probably the best poised to effect a serious relief efforrt where it is needed.
Tonight--really, as always, with Bush--I was struck by the courage of his convictions. I could appreciate Clinton for the innate political skill he obviously possesses, but I could never feel his convictions. Bush the First? Not sure he had much of a clue. Honestly, I don't care so much if I agree with where Bush is coming from, ans long as he can inspire me to go along with him.
But I'm very, very happy that I feel as though I always know where he is coming from.
Reeds, what does it matter who wrote the speech? Presidential speechwriters have been around since before you were born (and I don't care how old you are). Is that really the best you can do?
There is a reason--a very real reason--why Bush won such a powerful victory last November. Tonight stood testament to it.