Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Everything Else > Political Arena

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2009, 07:21 PM   #1
DirkFTW
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,249
DirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arne View Post
Which businesses should get the subsidies? After all, even I would hire a person in the $50,000 dollar rate if the government paid for it. He could wash my clothes or something...

Where does the money come from? After all, government is a redistributor of wealth. It has to take from someone either through:
- taking out loans (passing the debt on to our grandchildren... yep, that worked out just fine during the last 30 years or something)
- creating money out of thin air (stealing purchasing power from those who cannot increase their income immediately after this money is entered into the economy - that is: the poor and the middle class)
- taxing people which is very unlikely
The most probably scenario is the creation of new money (in your scenario and in the stimulus scenario of Obama), which is only going to make the real endgame crisis that much worse - that is: the dollar crisis.

Government has and will never stop a recession. It can only create them or prolong them. If they reduced their burden on society they might even stop a recession - but that is what they never do.
Dude you totally missed my point, which was it'd be cheaper -by $200 billion- to just give every unemployed person a $50,000-backed job. It's not a recommendation, it's a critique of the current stimulus. If it takes $780 billion to not create enough jobs for everyone in America, then what the heck is it for?

Not to mention, my plan would freaking work tomorrow as opposed to 2011. And I came up with it at 11 PM on a Friday night while scratching my ass.
__________________


Is this ghost ball??

Last edited by DirkFTW; 02-07-2009 at 07:23 PM.
DirkFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2009, 07:42 PM   #2
alexamenos
Diamond Member
 
alexamenos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Basketball fan nirvana
Posts: 5,625
alexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond reputealexamenos has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkFTW View Post
...Not to mention, my plan would freaking work tomorrow as opposed to 2011. And I came up with it at 11 PM on a Friday night while scratching my ass.
Which means you're over-qualified to be a US Congressman.
__________________
"It does not take a brain seargant to know the reason this team struggles." -- dmack24
alexamenos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 05:49 PM   #3
Arne
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,851
Arne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud ofArne has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkFTW View Post
Dude you totally missed my point, which was it'd be cheaper -by $200 billion- to just give every unemployed person a $50,000-backed job. It's not a recommendation, it's a critique of the current stimulus. If it takes $780 billion to not create enough jobs for everyone in America, then what the heck is it for?

Not to mention, my plan would freaking work tomorrow as opposed to 2011. And I came up with it at 11 PM on a Friday night while scratching my ass.
I'm sorry for that. It still bugs me that people are only criticizing the way this bill is carried out. It's a lonely few people who disagree with it on principle.
__________________

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - Ron Paul The Revolution - A Manifesto
Arne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 01:09 PM   #4
DirkFTW
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,249
DirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond reputeDirkFTW has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arne View Post
I'm sorry for that. It still bugs me that people are only criticizing the way this bill is carried out. It's a lonely few people who disagree with it on principle.
Oh, I too disagree with it on principle. But it looks like we've already lost that argument. The government was dead set on passing this monstrosity from the start.
__________________


Is this ghost ball??
DirkFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fluffonomics, got a bit fluffy in here, price-to-fluff ratio


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.