Based on your comment, I would say you are being facetious, with very little chance you are actually interested in this topic.
Forgive me if i am unable to accurately portray in words my perceived expectations for this prospect.
One thing you are going to have to pay attention to is that a lot of people who are interested in Mavericks basketball aren't going to be interested in some num-nut who is in the mix of the possibilities this year.
One thing you are going to have to pay attention to is that a lot of people who are interested in Mavericks basketball aren't going to be interested in some num-nut who is in the mix of the possibilities this year.
You need to be dlligent.
I realize that winning is probably the primary interest of most but looking forward and considering the new CBA i think it will be much harder for teams to consistently stay on top without occasionally hitting a home-run with a prospect outside the lottery.
I am by no means saying he will be a star but i do believe he will be of great value to a team who picks him outside the lottery.
I realize that winning is probably the primary interest of most but looking forward and considering the new CBA i think it will be much harder for teams to consistently stay on top without occasionally hitting a home-run with a prospect outside the lottery.
I am by no means saying he will be a star but i do believe he will be of great value to a team who picks him outside the lottery.
Good luck to Roy Hobbs, to be sure. I think we all wish that for him. Whether it ever sees the light of day, that we don't know. But it is what it is, as they say.
I wouldn't mind drafting Fournier, great size (6'7) with PG skills, has an underrated mid range game already, underrated athlete, great passer for a SG, he attacks the rim, defends, he could be a very good SG-SF if he develops an outside shot.