Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Everything Else > Political Arena

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-15-2005, 09:36 PM   #38
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default RE:nickelodeon

Quote:
Originally posted by: MavKikiNYC
Confusing article.

Why were they testing again? Were they trying to prove that Armstrong had used drugs? Or just practicin' ?

Quote:
L'Equipe said it matched anonymous urine samples from that Tour with medical statements signed by doctors, claiming that there were "characteristic, undeniable and consequent" signs of EPO in Armstrong's urine tests.
Huh? Anonymous samples? Matched to medical statements? Signed by WHICH doctors?


BTW, Cap......what's going on with that lawsuit?
the lawsuit was dismissed
-------------------------
Judge Dismisses Claim Against Armstrong
By Associated Press

2:53 PM PDT, September 9, 2005

AUSTIN, Texas — A state judge on Friday dismissed fraud and breach of contract claims filed against Tour de France champion Lance Armstrong by one of his former personal assistants.

Mike Anderson, who worked for Armstrong for about two years, has been in a legal fight with the retired cycling great over promises he claims Armstrong made to help him start a bike shop.

State District Judge Margaret Cooper informed Armstrong's and Anderson's lawyers of her decision by letter. A formal ruling will be filed later. Armstrong attorney Tim Herman said the ruling "totally vindicates" Armstrong.

Anderson's claim of mental distress had previously been dismissed.

Anderson's attorney, Hal Gillespie, said he will appeal and indicated his client is willing to pursue the matter for a long time.

"It's a disappointing ruling, but in about a year, we'll be right back," Gillespie said.

Anderson still has a legal claim pending that he should have been paid more than his $3,000 monthly salary for the work he did. Herman said he will ask the court to dismiss that as well.

Anderson created a stir when he filed the lawsuit, claiming he found a banned substance in Armstrong's apartment in Spain, a charge Armstrong has denied.

Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.