Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > Around the NBA

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-2017, 09:59 AM   #1
saclare
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,949
saclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant future
Default

Let's not let the fact that Chris Paul looked like garbage slip through the cracks of everything else that happened on a crazy opening night.

Nick Young also fits like a glove on that team. Coming off the bench and getting to chuck threes and play no D? That's his game right there, and it looks like he may be improved from a shooting perspective, though it's hard to tell if that's all NY or the massive space given to him due to the GSW offense.
saclare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2017, 10:08 AM   #2
EricaLubarsky
Inactive.
 
EricaLubarsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,473
EricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saclare View Post
Let's not let the fact that Chris Paul looked like garbage slip through the cracks of everything else that happened on a crazy opening night.

Nick Young also fits like a glove on that team. Coming off the bench and getting to chuck threes and play no D? That's his game right there, and it looks like he may be improved from a shooting perspective, though it's hard to tell if that's all NY or the massive space given to him due to the GSW offense.
Honestly Gordon and Tucker are better than Harden and Paul.
EricaLubarsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2017, 02:43 PM   #3
FreshJive
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,475
FreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricaLubarsky View Post
Honestly Gordon and Tucker are better than Harden and Paul.
There has to be words missing here.
FreshJive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2017, 03:06 PM   #4
EricaLubarsky
Inactive.
 
EricaLubarsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,473
EricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreshJive View Post
There has to be words missing here.
Sorry, I left out, "Harden is overrated trash that rarely has a positive +/- without getting bailed out by the refs and who has had only handful of games with a better +/- than Gordon. His +1 last night was pitiful next to Gordon's +16. Without Gordon, the Rockets would have lost bigly. Harden is the definition of quantity without efficiency. His assist numbers are good, but his TOs are terrible. His PPG is good, but his efficiency without FTs is subpar for a star. Rockets are also playing 8 guys which is a recipe for playoff success"

Last edited by EricaLubarsky; 10-18-2017 at 03:12 PM.
EricaLubarsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2017, 02:40 PM   #5
FreshJive
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,475
FreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond reputeFreshJive has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saclare View Post
Let's not let the fact that Chris Paul looked like garbage slip through the cracks of everything else that happened on a crazy opening night.

Nick Young also fits like a glove on that team. Coming off the bench and getting to chuck threes and play no D? That's his game right there, and it looks like he may be improved from a shooting perspective, though it's hard to tell if that's all NY or the massive space given to him due to the GSW offense.
He was hurt. I wouldn’t take anything away from it.
FreshJive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2017, 04:12 PM   #6
saclare
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,949
saclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreshJive View Post
He was hurt. I wouldn’t take anything away from it.
Late in the game. I always thought it was a poor fit for Paul and the Rockets. I think they're team would have been better off with Melo with Harden running point and Gordon inserted as the SG (that or a defensive minded 2 enabling them to keep Gordon as the 6th man). Or just keeping Beverly, should he not been included in a Melo trade.
saclare is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.