Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > Trade and Draft Board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2012, 05:20 PM   #1
sefant77
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 15,401
sefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Mavs 2012 Draft

This thread for all the discussions around our own pick.

We were tied for the 16th pick with the Knicks and Jazz. Lost the tiebreaker to the Knicks, won over Utah.

Mavs will pick #17 in a overall considered good draft.

Since its hard to grab at #17 player with immediatly impact i think we will trade this pick. Either with Odom/Jones to erase their salary or for a proven role player.

Draft order:
1. Bobcats - (25%)
2. Wizards - (19.9%)
3. Cleveland - (13.8%)
4. Hornets - (13.7%)
5. Sacramento - (7.6%)
6. Portland(via Nets top 3 protected) - (7.5%)
7. Warriors(Utah'z pick, top 7 protected) - (3.6%)
8. Raptors - (3.5%)
9. Detroit - (1.7%)
10. Hornets(via Minnesota) - (1.1%)
11. Portland - (0.8%)
12. Bucks - (0.7%)
13. Suns - (0.6%)
14. Houston - (0.5%)

----------------------------------------

15. Sixers
16. Houston(via Knicks)
17. Dallas
18. Minnesota(via Utah)
19. Orlando
20. Denver
21. Boston
22. Boston(via Clippers)
23. Atlanta
24. Cleveland(via Lakers)
25. Memphis
26. Indiana
27. Miami
28. Oklahoma City
29. Chicago
30. Golden State(via Spurs)

Last edited by sefant77; 04-27-2012 at 05:20 PM.
sefant77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012, 09:55 PM   #2
chumdawg
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cowboys Country
Posts: 23,336
chumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond reputechumdawg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Ever since Mo Ager, I haven't been too excited about the Mavs draft.
chumdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012, 01:31 AM   #3
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I think it's very, very unlikely that the Mavs start the season with a player drafted with this pick.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012, 02:52 AM   #4
CaseyJones
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dallas
Posts: 93
CaseyJones will become famous soon enough
Default

Theres a couple players that they could possibly get that may be worth keeping
__________________
CaseyJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 12:08 AM   #5
nowhereman
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 4,712
nowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I really wish the team would consider / held the assets to move up into the top 10. The Mavs haven't drafted a reliable rotation player since Devin Harris. With the new CBA, Cuban has to realize the value of impact rookie-wage players, right?

That said, I don't think the Mavs have a first round pick this year.
__________________



Quote:
RT @TyLawson3 Good game between Dallas and Portland. Good thing we didn't end up getting Dallas. Coach Karl lost his mind.
nowhereman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 12:26 AM   #6
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nowhereman View Post
That said, I don't think the Mavs have a first round pick this year.
Yes they do.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:09 AM   #7
nowhereman
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 4,712
nowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond reputenowhereman has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jthig32 View Post
Yes they do.
Right now they do. I don't think they'll hold on to the pick.
__________________



Quote:
RT @TyLawson3 Good game between Dallas and Portland. Good thing we didn't end up getting Dallas. Coach Karl lost his mind.
nowhereman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 01:14 AM   #8
He15man
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: California
Posts: 348
He15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to allHe15man is a name known to all
Default

If Brad Beal, shooting guard out of Florida falls down to 17th he would be a great pick up for Dallas.

He's been projected top 5, some say top 10. You never know with all the Kentucky guys going pro, add in a few Europeans.

I would love to see Bradley Beal fall to the Mavs but i doubt it happens.

Last edited by He15man; 04-30-2012 at 01:15 AM.
He15man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 03:11 AM   #9
Budapest Maverick
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 2,208
Budapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant future
Default

I'm really intrigued about 2 prospects in our range, Meyers Leonard, and Terrence Ross. Leonard is a C, elite athlete, with elite size (7'0), and a good defender, with an improving all-around game, he can get selected as high as 8-10 though. Ross is a 6'6 shooting guard, he's very athletic himself, and a natural shooter, he has a pretty grood stroke from deep, he shot 37% from 3, but he had lots of dribble, and pull up 3 judging by his mix, with us he'd get clean looks, and i think he should be able to shoot it around 40%. He's a good defender as well, he could get selected in the lottery as well, but most pegs him down around 15-17, so in our range.

Leonard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LWNpaPEw6o

Ross: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CYeHHeI4fg

They does not look like the next Podkolzin, or Mo Ager. We better keep this year's pick. This is said to be one of the deepest first round in NBA history. Not a lot of potential hall of fame prospect, but lots of potential starter, and rotation prospect.

Last edited by Budapest Maverick; 05-13-2012 at 03:12 AM.
Budapest Maverick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 04:22 AM   #10
Quetzalcoatl
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 491
Quetzalcoatl is a jewel in the roughQuetzalcoatl is a jewel in the roughQuetzalcoatl is a jewel in the roughQuetzalcoatl is a jewel in the rough
Default

I think they are interesting players, but I doubt if Leonard will be available for the 17th pick.

Ross meanwhile could be a good adquisition. Is he more a 2 or a 3?
Quetzalcoatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 04:32 AM   #11
Budapest Maverick
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 2,208
Budapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant futureBudapest Maverick has a brilliant future
Default

From what i've gathered, it looks like he's a prototypical shooting guard, with a very good stroke. And they also say, he has very good court vision, though his assist averages does not really reflect that. But court vision not always has a direct correlation with assist numbers, especially in college ball. Yeah, unfortunately there is a good chance Leonard gets selected in the lottery, maybe as high as 7 or 8. Somebody in that range will gamble on a talented big man. Still, Ross would be awesome, of course you can't be sure, but he would be our most interesting prospect with Roddy in the last 8 years. It would be time that we find a gem just like the Spurs seemingly does almost every year.

Last edited by Budapest Maverick; 05-13-2012 at 04:33 AM.
Budapest Maverick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 11:29 PM   #12
mavs777
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,002
mavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant future
Default

Not a fan of Leonard while he is skilled and can play from the high post he needs to get his upper stronger and plays soft and passive. Meanwhile Ross is a guy who can contribute right away, he has everything but handles, he can knock down threes well off the catch and shoot and is a very good defender.
__________________
mavs777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 12:47 AM   #13
EricaLubarsky
Inactive.
 
EricaLubarsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 41,931
EricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Kevin Murphy could be a steal for this team and he's really flying under the radar. He's decent defensively and an absolute beast from outside.

Jeffery Taylor could be a very good pickup and he won't take much to transition. Doesnt have a jumper but he gets his hands on a lot of balls and he could catch a lot of oops if we land Deron.

I like the idea of Ross because its always great to have a shooter and we certainly need to surround Dirk with a big down low, a PG and some shooters. Not everyone needs to be a playmaker if we get Deron.

Austin Rivers is a must if he drops. He's a Kev-Mart starter kit with a great all around game and an underrated feel for the game.

Not at all impressed with any of the prospects at center. Lots of SFs and undersized PFs again. Lots of talent but just a glut at 6'7"
EricaLubarsky is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2012, 02:45 PM   #14
sefant77
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 15,401
sefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond reputesefant77 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

We gonna pack our pick anyway...for a veteran player or to dumo salary.
sefant77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2012, 04:07 PM   #15
aexchange
Boom goes the Dynamite!
 
aexchange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,008
aexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sefant77 View Post
We gonna pack our pick anyway...for a veteran player or to dumo salary.
I don't think we can since technically next season our pick could fall outside of the top 20 and would need to be conferred to the Lakers. Someone who has read up on the CBA, help me out on this one.
aexchange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2012, 07:24 PM   #16
EricaLubarsky
Inactive.
 
EricaLubarsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 41,931
EricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aexchange View Post
I don't think we can since technically next season our pick could fall outside of the top 20 and would need to be conferred to the Lakers. Someone who has read up on the CBA, help me out on this one.
If I understand what Sefant was saying, there isnt a reason we can't.

We can trade either the 17th pick or the rights to whoever we pick at #17 to anyone and its all free and clear. All we owe is the next draft pick we have that is below 19.

The problem is for other teams primarily in that it ties up future draft picks, so if we trade our 2013 first rounder and next year we also end up 1-19, then whoever got our 2013 pick would have to wait until the Lakers (or whoever currently held the rights to that pick) got theirs. It mostly impacts the other team but teams may be less likely to trade with us if they know that they will be second in line for a pick.

Say, if we trade this year's 17 for a 2013 first rounder from Milwaukee-- we'd still have Milwaukee's pick regardless of where Milwaukee drafted, even if they drafted 20-30. Lakers get the first original MAVS pick that falls below 19, unless we never draft that low for the next 5 years. So if we did that Milwaukee trade and ended up in the same spot again next year and got a 16th pick overall, we'd have our 16th (which we wouldnt have to give up) AND Milwaukee's.

Last edited by EricaLubarsky; 05-15-2012 at 07:50 PM.
EricaLubarsky is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 06:23 PM   #17
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aexchange View Post
I don't think we can since technically next season our pick could fall outside of the top 20 and would need to be conferred to the Lakers. Someone who has read up on the CBA, help me out on this one.
They can just draft for someone and then trade the pick. The rule against trading consecutive first rounders only applies to future picks.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 06:08 PM   #18
mavs777
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,002
mavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sefant77 View Post
We gonna pack our pick anyway...for a veteran player or to dumo salary.
maybe for a veteran player but i highly doubt we use the pick to dump salary. Given Carlisle's comments that I believe BG posted on his twitter page they are about to start getting serious about evaluating draft prospects.
__________________
mavs777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 03:50 PM   #19
clutch#41
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,230
clutch#41 is a jewel in the roughclutch#41 is a jewel in the roughclutch#41 is a jewel in the rough
Default

been to a few draft sites and they have the mavs picking terrence ross!! not bad if you ask me. the mavs need to hit on this draft pick this year!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92pQIYhLo-k
clutch#41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 06:58 PM   #20
BGMaverick9
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,806
BGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Thought this had some good tidbits
http://www.nba.com/news/features/dav...rds/index.html

They always have the option of trading up: 17 and something like Roddy could possibly get you higher in the draft.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/BallinWithBryan/
BGMaverick9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 07:23 AM   #21
b_o_r
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,761
b_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BGMaverick9 View Post
Thought this had some good tidbits
http://www.nba.com/news/features/dav...rds/index.html

They always have the option of trading up: 17 and something like Roddy could possibly get you higher in the draft.
Just about to post that.
Roddy/17th pick/55th to New Orleans for the 10th pick. NO will be looking to get a point guard with their 2nd pick.

edit....
NO will probably package the 10th pick to get rid of Jarrett Jack's and or Ariza's contract.

Mocks have the Suns picking Ross and the 76ers picking Moultrie. If those are the guys they are looking at the Mavs will need to move up.

Not big on ball dominant 2's, so no to Austin Rivers.

Last edited by b_o_r; 05-31-2012 at 07:39 AM.
b_o_r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 11:47 AM   #22
mac222b
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,549
mac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b_o_r View Post
Just about to post that.
Roddy/17th pick/55th to New Orleans for the 10th pick. NO will be looking to get a point guard with their 2nd pick.

edit....
NO will probably package the 10th pick to get rid of Jarrett Jack's and or Ariza's contract.

Mocks have the Suns picking Ross and the 76ers picking Moultrie. If those are the guys they are looking at the Mavs will need to move up.

Not big on ball dominant 2's, so no to Austin Rivers.
Thats ALOT to give up for the 10th pick. I wouldnt give Roddy straight up for the 10th pick.
mac222b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 12:29 PM   #23
mavs777
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,002
mavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac222b View Post
Thats ALOT to give up for the 10th pick. I wouldnt give Roddy straight up for the 10th pick.
Well I wouldn't worry about getting Roddy for a lottery pick, those have a lot more value than him.
__________________
mavs777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 03:55 PM   #24
mac222b
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,549
mac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mavs777 View Post
Well I wouldn't worry about getting Roddy for a lottery pick, those have a lot more value than him.
Notice i said "I" wouldnt. Its situational. Some teams would and some wouldnt.
But its funny seeing people throwing around the idea of trading Roddy when he may be able to finally pay off on some of that potential, for a guy(pick #10)who's likely 2-3 yrs. away from contributing. Its backwards. Unless the Mavs think theyve scoped the next james harden at #10 or something. Even then he took a couple years to develop.
mac222b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 04:43 PM   #25
OneLove22
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 668
OneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac222b View Post
Thats ALOT to give up for the 10th pick. I wouldnt give Roddy straight up for the 10th pick.
I would in this years draft.
__________________
OneLove22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 06:07 AM   #26
b_o_r
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,761
b_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud ofb_o_r has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac222b View Post
Thats ALOT to give up for the 10th pick. I wouldnt give Roddy straight up for the 10th pick.
Ross is going to be off the board before the 17th pick. If you do get Deron, it would be nice to give a the PG a true SG. You probably resign West and Kidd. That leaves no room for Roddy once again. Giving up a player you only use when the major players are injured isn't giving up a lot.
b_o_r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 01:51 PM   #27
mac222b
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,549
mac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b_o_r View Post
Ross is going to be off the board before the 17th pick. If you do get Deron, it would be nice to give a the PG a true SG. You probably resign West and Kidd. That leaves no room for Roddy once again. Giving up a player you only use when the major players are injured isn't giving up a lot.
I understand the reasoning. But how is Ross any further along then Roddy? 2-3 yrs minimum before he's ready. And i really like Ross btw.

I just wonder if Roddy wouldnt have Brandon Jennings or Kyle Lowry trade value if he were given 36+ minutes. i think he would. I also think its rare that
a young vet is traded for a low lottery pick and it works out for both teams. George Hill for Kawhi Leonard this past happened to work out really well for both teams.

So yeah, if the Mavs sign Deron and re-sign Kidd and West we would have a glut of combo guards. And if the Mavs see a cant-miss Kawhi Leonard type at around
pick 9 or 10 and have a willing trade partner that has a need and loves Roddy, then yes i could see the Mavs pulling the trigger on a deal like that. Alot of things have to happen for that trade to come off though.

Last edited by mac222b; 06-01-2012 at 01:57 PM.
mac222b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 11:19 AM   #28
clutch#41
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,230
clutch#41 is a jewel in the roughclutch#41 is a jewel in the roughclutch#41 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac222b View Post
Thats ALOT to give up for the 10th pick. I wouldnt give Roddy straight up for the 10th pick.
roddy for the 10th pick? i would do it in a heartbeat. i was one of roddybs biggest supporters at one point. but i think we've seen his peak, the inconsistent play, the foot injuries. is he a pg or sg?how many mins did he play in the playoffs like 8 mins? free roddy b and i hope its elsewhere. 2 picks in the top 17 of a deep draft. i can dig it!
clutch#41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 12:42 AM   #29
mavs777
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,002
mavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant future
Default

aldridge having ross as a borderline first rounder and behind the likes of waiters (who can't shoot and is undersized) and jenkins (who can only shoot) is pretty funny imo.
__________________
mavs777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 12:40 AM   #30
mac222b
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,549
mac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond reputemac222b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mavs777 View Post
aldridge having ross as a borderline first rounder and behind the likes of waiters (who can't shoot and is undersized) and jenkins (who can only shoot) is pretty funny imo.
Waiters can shoot and actually has NBA range. I'd be thrilled if
we got him at 17.
mac222b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 09:15 AM   #31
Underdog
Moderator
 
Underdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
Underdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond reputeUnderdog has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Pacers reminding me just how good the #17 pick can be - both Granger and Hibbert were drafted 17th overall...
__________________

These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.

Last edited by Underdog; 05-19-2012 at 09:16 AM.
Underdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 01:02 PM   #32
DevinHarriswillstart
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,939
DevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog View Post
Pacers reminding me just how good the #17 pick can be - both Granger and Hibbert were drafted 17th overall...
And Shumpert last draft has turned out to be a pretty decent player. Definitely shouldn't waste it unless they want to trade up.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy

DevinHarriswillstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 03:14 PM   #33
BGMaverick9
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,806
BGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond reputeBGMaverick9 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Arnett Moultrie was in town this week for a workout

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/...Moultrie-5754/
http://www.nbadraft.net/players/arnett-moultrie
http://www.nba.com/news/features/dav...rds/index.html
__________________
Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/BallinWithBryan/
BGMaverick9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 03:37 PM   #34
DevinHarriswillstart
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,939
DevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond repute
Default

That's kinda exciting. He'd be a good pick. I hope they also work out Leonard and Ross.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy

DevinHarriswillstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 09:21 AM   #35
sike
The Preacha
 
sike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rock
Posts: 36,066
sike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

WWSAD?
__________________

ok, we've talked about the problem of evil, and the extent of the atonement's application, but my real question to you is, "Could Jesus dunk?"
sike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 05:36 PM   #36
Bayliss
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 16,054
Bayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond reputeBayliss has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
WWSAD?
Tank a year and grab the first pick and draft the best PF ever? While still having a Top 10-Top 15 center on their roster as well?
Bayliss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 06:57 PM   #37
spreedom
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 3,938
spreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond reputespreedom has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayliss View Post
Tank a year and grab the first pick and draft the best PF ever? While still having a Top 10-Top 15 center on their roster as well?
Keep in mind that Duncan is also the only player on the roster that they drafted higher than #15 overall.

The Spurs' on-court personnel might be a pack of douchey crybabies, but every organization could learn a thing or two from the Spurs' front office.
spreedom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 09:41 PM   #38
clutch#41
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,230
clutch#41 is a jewel in the roughclutch#41 is a jewel in the roughclutch#41 is a jewel in the rough
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQR4UJK7Hn8

he reminds me of KG.
clutch#41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 11:36 PM   #39
mavs777
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,002
mavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant futuremavs777 has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clutch#41 View Post
His demeanor and effort is the exact opposite of KG.
__________________

Last edited by mavs777; 05-25-2012 at 11:36 PM.
mavs777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 03:39 AM   #40
OneLove22
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 668
OneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to allOneLove22 is a name known to all
Default

Right now I'm reading Mocks that have us taking Dion Waiters at #17.

Wouldn't that be real nice.
__________________
OneLove22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.