Rep. Ron Paul for Prez

[Dirkadirkastan]

Originally Posted by SeanL

Well since Paul said he never said it that puts an end to it - despite video evidence of him defending it. Paul would never lie! [/snark]

When I watch this video, I see him explicitly defending racist comments. Wait, no I don't. I see him referring to the newsletters as an exposition on monetary policy. That's not quite the same thing, is it?

Three or four malignant excerpts in 20 years of newsletters associated with, but not written by, your target of smear tactics is not worthy of any credence. Sure, Paul would have a vested interest in deflecting negative accusations, but his detractors also have a vested interest in conjuring them.

The burden of proof is on you though to supply the evidence to back up your claim, and a video on monetary policy is hardly damning. The fact you already resort to such a thing tells a lot.

[SeanL]

Originally Posted by Dirkadirkastan

When I watch this video, I see him explicitly defending racist comments. Wait, no I don't. I see him referring to the newsletters as an exposition on monetary policy. That's not quite the same thing, is it?

Three or four malignant excerpts in 20 years of newsletters associated with, but not written by, your target of smear tactics is not worthy of any credence. Sure, Paul would have a vested interest in deflecting negative accusations, but his detractors also have a vested interest in conjuring them.

The burden of proof is on you though to supply the evidence to back up your claim, and a video on monetary policy is hardly damning. The fact you already resort to such a thing tells a lot.

The video shows him defending the black thieves are fleet of foot claim. What more evidence do you need? Clearly you have deluded yourself.

[Dirkadirkastan]

Originally Posted by SeanL

The video shows him defending the black thieves are fleet of foot claim. What more evidence do you need? Clearly you have deluded yourself.

Now I'm starting to think you didn't watch either video.