 |
|
06-24-2004, 11:57 PM
|
#1 |
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,447
  |
Why Nash and not Daniels?
I'm not sure if its just me but if I were the Lakers, I would want Daniels instead of Nash. If the Lakers are going into rebuilding mode and they are rebuilding around Kobe, won't they want a pg that will grow old with Kobe? In my opinion, Daniels would be more attractive in the package.
__________________
If you keep doing what you're doing, you'll keep getting what you're getting |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
06-24-2004, 11:59 PM
|
#2 |
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
|
RE: Why Nash and not Daniels?
*&^#(*&)@#&@(#&$^*$^(*&%)@#%)@&#$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the last time, people - Daniels is not a tradeable asset. In order to resign him we will have to use our MLE, and players signed using the MLE cannot be traded.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in." -Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers. |
|
|
|
|
06-25-2004, 12:48 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Inactive.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,484
|
RE:Why Nash and not Daniels?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.