Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > General Mavs Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2024, 06:15 PM   #1
DevinHarriswillstart
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,067
DevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Rumor that Toronto wants win-now players in their rotation, so maybe they would be open to Exum. They also want 2 firsts.

Stein said Mavs weren't that interested, but he is the best player available so far. Gotta keep discussing it.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy

DevinHarriswillstart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2024, 06:38 PM   #2
SMC0007
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,474
SMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DevinHarriswillstart View Post
Rumor that Toronto wants win-now players in their rotation, so maybe they would be open to Exum. They also want 2 firsts.

Stein said Mavs weren't that interested, but he is the best player available so far. Gotta keep discussing it.
Isnt this what we do most times? Reach out to the most unattainable player and then handle the inevitable rejection with "well we weren't really that interested anyway". Then miss out on very usable players that we should have pivoted to immediately.

Just keep DP off the floor before someone else accidentally gets injured again. Lets see more exciting basketball every other game and deal with the absolute fn duds in between.
__________________


you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
SMC0007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2024, 12:11 PM   #3
saclare
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,950
saclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMC0007 View Post
Isnt this what we do most times? Reach out to the most unattainable player and then handle the inevitable rejection with "well we weren't really that interested anyway". Then miss out on very usable players that we should have pivoted to immediately.

Just keep DP off the floor before someone else accidentally gets injured again. Lets see more exciting basketball every other game and deal with the absolute fn duds in between.
Def agree here. Make moves ahead of the curve...but it does take two to tango, and sometimes three. Still, don't sit on your hands seeing if they will eventually take the offer for a Siakam when a Stewart or Drummond or others can be had and can start helping to win games now.
saclare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2024, 02:08 PM   #4
purplefrog
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: state of eternal optimism
Posts: 2,840
purplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I thought the MBT might make a move to trade for John Collins last summer. They ended up with Grant. I am guessing both teams have buyer's remorse. Perhaps a change of scenery would help all parties involved. Grant + Holmes for Collins is not far-fetched given JC's bloated contract. Jazz might reason that it would be easier to dump GW's $14M contract than Collins $25M or just the change in system would somehow ignite the energy lacking in Grant . Mavs might be thinking JC would help with rebounding and be as potent as GW from beyond the arc. I would rather trade GW for Olynyk but it appears there will be a lot of competition for KO. This is the kind of trade that seems more likely than somehow getting Siakam.
__________________
"Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it. Ignorance may deride it. Malice may distort it. But there it is." - Winston Churchill
purplefrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2024, 03:26 PM   #5
DevinHarriswillstart
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,067
DevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond reputeDevinHarriswillstart has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purplefrog View Post
I thought the MBT might make a move to trade for John Collins last summer. They ended up with Grant. I am guessing both teams have buyer's remorse. Perhaps a change of scenery would help all parties involved. Grant + Holmes for Collins is not far-fetched given JC's bloated contract. Jazz might reason that it would be easier to dump GW's $14M contract than Collins $25M or just the change in system would somehow ignite the energy lacking in Grant . Mavs might be thinking JC would help with rebounding and be as potent as GW from beyond the arc. I would rather trade GW for Olynyk but it appears there will be a lot of competition for KO. This is the kind of trade that seems more likely than somehow getting Siakam.
It is funny that after Grant sported that Eagles jersey that his game has plummeted. Guess he let the Cowboys fans get to him...
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy

DevinHarriswillstart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2024, 04:23 PM   #6
saclare
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,950
saclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant futuresaclare has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purplefrog View Post
I thought the MBT might make a move to trade for John Collins last summer. They ended up with Grant. I am guessing both teams have buyer's remorse. Perhaps a change of scenery would help all parties involved. Grant + Holmes for Collins is not far-fetched given JC's bloated contract. Jazz might reason that it would be easier to dump GW's $14M contract than Collins $25M or just the change in system would somehow ignite the energy lacking in Grant . Mavs might be thinking JC would help with rebounding and be as potent as GW from beyond the arc. I would rather trade GW for Olynyk but it appears there will be a lot of competition for KO. This is the kind of trade that seems more likely than somehow getting Siakam.
I'm down. Collins rebounding would complement Lively as much as the latter's defense helps Collins at the 4.

John Collins has fit this roster for a while now. (edit: much better now with Lively)

Last edited by saclare; 01-03-2024 at 04:25 PM.
saclare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2024, 04:30 PM   #7
purplefrog
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: state of eternal optimism
Posts: 2,840
purplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saclare View Post
I'm down. Collins rebounding would complement Lively as much as the latter's defense helps Collins at the 4.

John Collins has fit this roster for a while now. (edit: much better now with Lively)
Collins could also log some minutes as a stretch 5. That is something the Mavs do not have right now (maybe Kleber eventually, but I wouldn't count on it). Collins' salary is way too high for his expected contribution, but it might be worth it if you can make a trade without giving up Hardy or Green (might need them for a second move down the road).
__________________
"Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it. Ignorance may deride it. Malice may distort it. But there it is." - Winston Churchill
purplefrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.