01-13-2016, 06:22 PM
|
#1
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
Parsons had a great first half and his shot looked good because he was letting things come to him and not overthinking.
In the second half, I saw him do his STUPID on 2-3 possessions and I knew it was going to be a different story....and it was.
YES he played good D and had a good half but he needs to be CONSISTENT and play within the team structure.
The D towards the end of the dame was horrible...they had layups or dunks on like 5 possessions.
Dirk had another KILLER TO that didn't help out cause.
Matthews was BAD.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MavzMan
Parsons tonight:
25 points on 10/14 shooting
3/6 3PA
8 rebounds
1 assist
2 steals
3 TOs
Defended Lebron amazing well at times ... let him drive to an open layup at others.
Overall pretty good game.
|
__________________
77
|
|
|
01-13-2016, 08:10 PM
|
#2
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AO41
Parsons had a great first half and his shot looked good because he was letting things come to him and not overthinking.
In the second half, I saw him do his STUPID on 2-3 possessions and I knew it was going to be a different story....and it was.
YES he played good D and had a good half but he needs to be CONSISTENT and play within the team structure.
The D towards the end of the dame was horrible...they had layups or dunks on like 5 possessions.
Dirk had another KILLER TO that didn't help out cause.
Matthews was BAD.
|
He needs to be consistent but that can be said for just about every single player outside of Zaza. Even Dirk has had 2 uncharacteristic crunch time TO's in recent games. He shot it 14 times, the ball was evenly distributed among the starters shot wise, I don't think you will ever see any one player on this team soot 20 times outside of Dirk. I don't know why that's a negative, he didn't score in the second half like he did the first but if that's a problem you can go ahead and list the entire lineup for not being consistent on a half by half game by game basis... Yet the only one who has an entire thread based on his play not being good enough or not fitting is Parsons. Pretty sure that's why every game thread the common joke is that it's Parsons fault because when he doesn't play well this thread is updated, when he plays well this thread is updated on the notion that it's not consistent. He seriously can't win and it's become comical.
|
|
|
01-14-2016, 01:18 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oak Cliff
Posts: 545
|
Good to see Parsons have a great game.
Hopefully he will continue to have more games like this as his injury is put behind him. I look for him to have a solid second half.
|
|
|
01-21-2016, 01:07 AM
|
#4
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,183
|
This is his chance to be that guy. What Parsons needs to do more than anything is not get passive when his shot isn't falling. If he has one of his 2-8 games, then he needs to stay aggressive offensively and not just think "welp, 2-8, this isn't my night so I'll pass to everyone else." That will be his real test. The ability to have bad quarters and snap himself out of it.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
01-21-2016, 01:49 AM
|
#5
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 11,699
|
But this is the type of setting Parsons thrives in.
He needs the ball A LOT in his hands. And he doesnt do well with slower type centers (zaza) or other slow guys around him (dirk). So Dirk is out and Zaza wasnt going ham on rebounds down low. Parsons is able to take over and get to the rim.(which is where he is best)
But when these guys are a force, he takes a backseat. Hes just a weird piece to fit in with the offense.
__________________
|
|
|
01-21-2016, 08:40 AM
|
#6
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 11,699
|
Parsons on Dirk:
"Pretty much we shoot every day, even on off days we come in. I wouldnt want to work with anyone else in the league, ever..."
AWWWWWWWW
__________________
|
|
|
01-21-2016, 09:44 AM
|
#7
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,577
|
Parsons obviously has talent and ability, but he is not agressive enough to be a force consistently yet. He really needs to make his mind up to be assertive and mix up his game more. Good to see tonight
__________________
you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
|
|
|
01-21-2016, 10:55 AM
|
#8
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,463
|
At some point someone younger than 37 needs to be our goto guy. DWill and Felton have been the only ones who seem to embrace that role but I'd love to see Parsons thrive because he has ability to get to rim and is much younger.
|
|
|
01-26-2016, 09:39 AM
|
#9
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
Parsons is HOTT right now and in my opinion it still shows what I have been saying all along. He needs the ball to be successful.... otherwise he doesn't di nuch out there. WHEN he has the ball he put up great "Kevin Love" stats with not much ti show for. He just doesn't have that IT....even when he is on a roll and playing good ball.
So I think this is a good time to look for a trade...but ONLY if it improves our team. Maybe we can get a few teams to bite based on how he has played lately. BUT if we can't find a very good trade then we should just roll with Parsons and what we have. I think we can be somewhat successful thay way as well.
__________________
77
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 02:02 PM
|
#10
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,183
|
25.4 ppg, 7 rpg on 59%! shooting, 60%! from three last 5 games.
Yup, get rid of him. Actually, I was definitely skeptical that he could put up those kind of stats again, but nice to see he actually does have all-star potential.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
Last edited by DevinHarriswillstart; 01-28-2016 at 03:09 PM.
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 02:58 PM
|
#11
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 59
|
I think it amusing how Parsons gets thrown under the bus around here, while Matthews seems to have carte blanche to consistently *kill* our offense on a nightly basis. I get it. He's got a great attitude and plays good, but not spectacular D (though his rebounding isn't impressive). However, his inability to hit the open 3 (his only offensive skill, especially now that he can't really post-up), really cripples our offense. The man has no lift and limps running the floor. That contract really is going to look bad as I don't see him changing much in the future.
CP, however, looks to be recovering well. He is not, and will never be, a number one option. But he can be Hayward-esque. A 20/5/5 guy and number 2 option on a contending team. He just needs the ball in his hands. He's a creator...not a spot-up shooter. It's tough in RC's system because Deron, and JJB especially, do so much ball-pounding.
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 04:08 PM
|
#12
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10AMGareDuNord
I think it amusing how Parsons gets thrown under the bus around here, while Matthews seems to have carte blanche to consistently *kill* our offense on a nightly basis. I get it. He's got a great attitude and plays good, but not spectacular D (though his rebounding isn't impressive). However, his inability to hit the open 3 (his only offensive skill, especially now that he can't really post-up), really cripples our offense. The man has no lift and limps running the floor. That contract really is going to look bad as I don't see him changing much in the future.
CP, however, looks to be recovering well. He is not, and will never be, a number one option. But he can be Hayward-esque. A 20/5/5 guy and number 2 option on a contending team. He just needs the ball in his hands. He's a creator...not a spot-up shooter. It's tough in RC's system because Deron, and JJB especially, do so much ball-pounding.
|
I am most def. irritated with Matthews' play and I think he just tries too hard at time. He is a little out of his element especially when it comes to handling the ball or creating anything.
The difference is he and Parsons were brought in under different expectations. The last 5 game Parsons has been GREAT and has shown why we had high expectations. BUT to me its fools gold and there is no way he will carry this team. Thats why I think we should trade him now...IF we can get a deal that improves the team.
As for Matthews ..we just gave him that contract and he has been terrible. I just think he needs to get back to what he does and thats open 3's and spot up shooting with some good D. He is the ultimate role player and can be a great ft here ...BUT he is not star and thats what he has been pushing himself to be with this new contract.
__________________
77
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 06:02 PM
|
#13
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AO41
I am most def. irritated with Matthews' play and I think he just tries too hard at time. He is a little out of his element especially when it comes to handling the ball or creating anything.
The difference is he and Parsons were brought in under different expectations. The last 5 game Parsons has been GREAT and has shown why we had high expectations. BUT to me its fools gold and there is no way he will carry this team. Thats why I think we should trade him now...IF we can get a deal that improves the team.
As for Matthews ..we just gave him that contract and he has been terrible. I just think he needs to get back to what he does and thats open 3's and spot up shooting with some good D. He is the ultimate role player and can be a great ft here ...BUT he is not star and thats what he has been pushing himself to be with this new contract.
|
Wait so Matthews is a role-player and if he is just a role player being paid 16-18m that is fine. Parsons has to be a star tho and carry the team if not we need to trade him? Why does Parsons have to be a "star"? Why can't he be a part of a "core"? Why does a guy being paid more get to have lower expectations?
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 06:48 PM
|
#14
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan_Wilson
Wait so Matthews is a role-player and if he is just a role player being paid 16-18m that is fine. Parsons has to be a star tho and carry the team if not we need to trade him? Why does Parsons have to be a "star"? Why can't he be a part of a "core"? Why does a guy being paid more get to have lower expectations?
|
I didn't say it was fine. Neither guy will carry this team. RC like good pint guard and as long as he is here, Parsons will not have the ball in his hands as much as he needs it to be effective.
Matthews can still put up 18ppg without having the ball in his hands.....Parsons cant because hes a different player.
Seeing that parsons is playing really well, I think we can get some quality players that will make the Mavs a better team overall once we get the STAR that can actually help us compete with the top teams in the NBA.
__________________
77
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 07:00 PM
|
#15
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AO41
Matthews can still put up 18ppg without having the ball in his hands.
|
That's an odd conclusion to come to about a guy who has never averaged over 16.4 PPG, and is currently putting up 12.8 PPG.
I mean, I get your point about Parsons, but trying to juxtapose his scoring ability with Wes isn't working for this argument... Matthews has been somewhat ineffective with or without the ball in his hands.
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 01-28-2016 at 07:04 PM.
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 09:10 PM
|
#16
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 651
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan_Wilson
Wait so Matthews is a role-player and if he is just a role player being paid 16-18m that is fine. Parsons has to be a star tho and carry the team if not we need to trade him? Why does Parsons have to be a "star"? Why can't he be a part of a "core"? Why does a guy being paid more get to have lower expectations?
|
Parson was brought in to become a star player for the mavs and so far he has failed. Even he said he would take the next step with the mavs but so far no luck. He was supposed to be the 2nd leading scorer last year but was 3rd. Supposed to be this year but it is Dwill. Hey I'm disappointed at Matthews but he was brought in to be and 3 and D role guy. Parsons was brought in to be a franchise player but looks like that will never happen. Overall both players are result of Mark Cuban inability to draft. He rather sign a 2nd round pick to a Max then hire scouts and get rookie players for minimal salary. Dirk is still the main guy on this team so making Dirk the 2nd best player has failed. We are currently in year 5 of mediocrity.
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 02:58 PM
|
#17
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 59
|
I think it amusing how Parsons gets thrown under the bus around here, while Matthews seems to have carte blanche to consistently *kill* our offense on a nightly basis. I get it. He's got a great attitude and plays good, but not spectacular D (though his rebounding isn't impressive). However, his inability to hit the open 3 (his only offensive skill, especially now that he can't really post-up), really cripples our offense. The man has no lift and limps running the floor. That contract really is going to look bad as I don't see him changing much in the future.
CP, however, looks to be recovering well. He is not, and will never be, a number one option. But he can be Hayward-esque. A 20/5/5 guy and number 2 option on a contending team. He just needs the ball in his hands. He's a creator...not a spot-up shooter. It's tough in RC's system because Deron, and JJB especially, do so much ball-pounding.
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 03:21 PM
|
#18
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10AMGareDuNord
I think it amusing how Parsons gets thrown under the bus around here, while Matthews seems to have carte blanche to consistently *kill* our offense on a nightly basis. I get it. He's got a great attitude and plays good, but not spectacular D (though his rebounding isn't impressive). However, his inability to hit the open 3 (his only offensive skill, especially now that he can't really post-up), really cripples our offense. The man has no lift and limps running the floor. That contract really is going to look bad as I don't see him changing much in the future.
|
I don't think his contract is going to be that big of an issue with the cap about to skyrocket (mainly because he'll still be tradable to bottom feeders trying to stay within the minimum 90% of their cap as it balloons), but Wes definitely isn't looking like a guy who can start for a contender anymore... Maybe he needs to sit out and continue to heal, but I'm starting to get the impression that his injury has permanently grounded the lift in his shot... And, like you said, his defense hasn't been good enough to make up for the decline in his offense, so what's he really bringing to the table?
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 03:33 PM
|
#19
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
I don't think his contract is going to be that big of an issue with the cap about to skyrocket (mainly because he'll still be tradable to bottom feeders trying to stay within the minimum 90% of their cap as it balloons), but Wes definitely isn't looking like a guy who can start for a contender anymore... Maybe he needs to sit out and continue to heal, but I'm starting to get the impression that his injury has permanently grounded the lift in his shot... And, like you said, his defense hasn't been good enough to make up for the decline in his offense, so what's he really bringing to the table?
|
He looks terrified of contact the few times he has gone to the rim. To me, it's the mental aspect if his injury that is the real killer.
Good news is that he was still the best 2 guard free agent option this past summer that the Mavs actually had a chance at. You'd still be having to spend at least 12 a year for Ellis who isn't really doing much better on the Pacers and doesn't play defense.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 09:29 PM
|
#20
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,154
|
Personally...I think a SF like Green (Memphis) would have been an awesome fit with this team or a guy like Aminu. Not saying they are more talented...just that their games would fit better and would contribute more towards making this a better team.
__________________
77
|
|
|
01-28-2016, 10:51 PM
|
#21
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AO41
Personally...I think a SF like Green (Memphis) would have been an awesome fit with this team or a guy like Aminu. Not saying they are more talented...just that their games would fit better and would contribute more towards making this a better team.
|
I personally disagree on the Green idea. He likes the ball in his hands just as much as Parsons only he is always looking to score and he does it much less efficiently. And this year was so bad he was benched. He is a worse defender than Parsons and their rebounding is similar. Parsons is a better catch and shoot player also.
I like Aminu but not as a starter on this team. I liked him for what he was last season. He provides minimal on the offensive end. We alrdy have Matthews not providing much offensively and adding Aminu and taking out Parsons is not going to help Wes score more. It would make it harder, and if you think he is pressing to live up to his contract now, imagine taking off an offensive wpn like parsons substituting a 10point guy in aminu. If anything Wes might be pressing more. Also Last year we used Aminu half at the 3 and half at the 4, if you take Parsons off this team for Aminu it would be Dwill/Felton/Wes/Aminu/Center while Dirk is off the floor for defense/rebounding and then I think Aminu would sub out for Dirk to maintain the 2 pg lineup that RC is in love with(in his defense it's one of the top clutch lineups in the NBA) and it would be Dwill/Felton/Wes/Dirk/C. I still think Aminu's best role was what RC used him as. A Versatile defender and high energy "super sub" for this small ball era. I personally don't think he's a great starter, especially alongside Iron Man. They could dig in on Dirk in the post and cheat over toward wes on the perimeter and leave Aminu open, as improved as he is it's still not even league average.
|
|
|
01-29-2016, 02:16 AM
|
#22
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 59
|
Jeff Green is garbage. Not a playmaker. Lazy, uninspired player who will look amazing every 10th game then revert to a lazy bum.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 01:29 PM
|
#23
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
@MFollowill: Chandler Parsons moved into top 20 in league in 3pt% last night... Shooting career best 40.1% (53% over last 13 games)
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 02-07-2016 at 01:29 PM.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 01:57 PM
|
#24
|
Inactive.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,906
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
@MFollowill: Chandler Parsons moved into top 20 in league in 3pt% last night... Shooting career best 40.1% (53% over last 13 games)
|
I blame Parsons
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 02:39 PM
|
#25
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricaLubarsky
I blame Parsons
|
The advanced stats are whack when it comes to Parsons. 10-15 shooting with 8 rebounds 4 assists, 5-8 on threes and yet a +2? His game and in game plus/minus aren't getting along.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 04:32 PM
|
#26
|
Inactive.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,906
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevinHarriswillstart
The advanced stats are whack when it comes to Parsons. 10-15 shooting with 8 rebounds 4 assists, 5-8 on threes and yet a +2? His game and in game plus/minus aren't getting along.
|
1) Those aren't advanced stats you are using
2) Poor defense can make big stats useless. Dirk could score 75 with 20 rebounds and 15 assists, but if we are a defensive, sieve of course the +/- wouldn't be stellar
3) We can always trade for Rondo, the king of stat padding
Last edited by EricaLubarsky; 02-07-2016 at 04:33 PM.
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 12:22 PM
|
#27
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
@bobbykaralla: Chandler Parsons' last 15 games:
20.2 pts
5.9 reb
2.4 ast
53.2/51.8/78.6%
66.6 TS%
63.8 eFG%
122 OffRtg
22.8 usage
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 12:26 PM
|
#28
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
@bobbykaralla: Chandler Parsons' last 15 games:
20.2 pts
5.9 reb
2.4 ast
53.2/51.8/78.6%
66.6 TS%
63.8 eFG%
122 OffRtg
22.8 usage
|
Been the best player on the team in that span. Nice to see and the best thing the Mavs have going for them right now.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 01:34 PM
|
#29
|
The Preacha
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rock
Posts: 36,066
|
Parsons has been so good lately. Really fun to watch him w the ball in his hands.
It is almost certainly NOT sustainable, but if he can stabilize and maintain a high level, I say pay that man his money when he opts out.
__________________
ok, we've talked about the problem of evil, and the extent of the atonement's application, but my real question to you is, "Could Jesus dunk?"
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 01:49 PM
|
#30
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,549
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sike
Parsons has been so good lately. Really fun to watch him w the ball in his hands.
It is almost certainly NOT sustainable, but if he can stabilize and maintain a high level, I say pay that man his money when he opts out.
|
Gonna be another crazy summer. Dirk and Parsons can potentially opt out. D-Will almost certainly will. Zaza or some other center gonna get paid. Be interesting to see if they bring this group back. Or throw money at younger guys and start to build for post Dirk. Or some combination thereof.
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 03:01 PM
|
#31
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 900
|
Why would CP stay in Dallas and put up with RC's crap? I expect to see him leave. Lots of teams will have money this summer. He's gone.
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 03:08 PM
|
#32
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGM
Why would CP stay in Dallas and put up with RC's crap? I expect to see him leave. Lots of teams will have money this summer. He's gone.
|
WTF are you talking about? Parsons is playing the best basketball of his career right now because Rick Carlisle made him the focus of our offense... Who else is going to offer him that??
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 02-22-2016 at 03:31 PM.
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 03:32 PM
|
#33
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
WTF are you talking about? Parsons is playing the best basketball of his career right now because Rick Carlisle made him the focus of our offense... Who else is going to offer him that??
|
Watch
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 03:45 PM
|
#34
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGM
Watch
|
So you have absolutely nothing to back up your claim other than a "gut feeling" based on your pet-hatred for Rick Carlisle? Like, Rick is such a bad coach and terrible person that he's going to drive Parsons away? And of course your opinion of Carlisle's coaching ability stems 100% from him not giving more minutes to the worst players on this team...
Have you ever considered that maybe your gut has shit for brains?
Quote:
Chandler Parsons and Mavericks Coach Rick Carlisle Are Basically Besties
Carlisle and Parsons, who can look out the windows of their posh apartments in Uptown Dallas high-rises and see each other’s balconies, spend an inordinate amount of time together. Most of it is basketball-based, as Parsons often shoots and watches film with Carlisle in one-on-one sessions. But they also socialize some, having attended concerts together and shared many meals, occasionally with Carlisle’s wife and daughter and Parsons’ parents and/or longtime best friend/personal assistant, Pausha Haghighi.
|
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 02-22-2016 at 03:46 PM.
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 06:58 AM
|
#35
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
So you have absolutely nothing to back up your claim other than a "gut feeling" based on your pet-hatred for Rick Carlisle? Like, Rick is such a bad coach and terrible person that he's going to drive Parsons away? And of course your opinion of Carlisle's coaching ability stems 100% from him not giving more minutes to the worst players on this team...
Have you ever considered that maybe your gut has shit for brains?
|
Send the link. Want to read it myself. You may very well be full of it.
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 03:53 PM
|
#36
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,183
|
Rick is definitely tough on Parsons by design. Thing is that Rick thinks he can be a superstar in a way that most fans probably don't.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
02-22-2016, 04:00 PM
|
#37
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevinHarriswillstart
Rick is definitely tough on Parsons by design. Thing is that Rick thinks he can be a superstar in a way that most fans probably don't.
|
Yeah, a coach who is pushing him to become an All-Star and an owner who is already paying him like an All-Star -- where is Parsons going to find a better deal than that?
The only worry he has in Dallas is living up to expectations.
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
Last edited by Underdog; 02-22-2016 at 04:01 PM.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 10:00 PM
|
#38
|
Guru
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 15,401
|
RC is tough on Parsons, but they also like to troll each other a little bit. Also via media. Same with pretty much the entire team. Parsons with Cuban (fashion), Dirk and Zaza...well Dirk pretty much trolls everyone...
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 01:51 AM
|
#39
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,183
|
Parsons also basically convinced Jordan to come here before baby huey changed his mind. Without him, we would have had no shot at all at someone like that. That kind of sway is worth its weight in gold. Fans may be divided on him, but players seem to really respond to him on a personal level.
__________________
"Cream of the crop gon' rise to the top." -Jaden Hardy
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 06:10 PM
|
#40
|
The Preacha
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rock
Posts: 36,066
|
UD ain't making stuff up to score points.
__________________
ok, we've talked about the problem of evil, and the extent of the atonement's application, but my real question to you is, "Could Jesus dunk?"
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.
|