View Poll Results: the best route to the 2nd round for the mavs?
|
lakers
|
|
8 |
5.59% |
hornets
|
|
76 |
53.15% |
spurs
|
|
59 |
41.26% |
04-08-2008, 04:29 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 749
|
the best route to the 2nd round for the mavs?
which team do the mavs match up with best in the first round.
i hear a lot of folks saying the spurs are the team for the mavs to avoid since the kid trade.
i still think the spurs are the easiest road to the 2nd round
the most likely opponents in the 1st round are the lakers, hornets, and the spurs.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 06:08 PM
|
#2
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,857
|
I think the Hornets are a little wet between the ears for the playoffs, then again the Scott-Kidd lead Nets team of 2001 had virtually no playoff experience. Can Scott-Paul do the same in a rugged West? I doubt it. I think the combo of West and Chandler can be stopped, as we saw a comparable (Shaq/Amare)big man tandem have their problems with the Mavs. I think paul becomes the key, can he be stopped, slowed down? Peja's going to be hit or miss. They don't have much bench bigs, so West and Chandler will ahve to see 40 minute nights in the series. But I think the Mavs can get by them in a 7 gamer. Spurs would be tough given all the experience and weapons. Lakers with Bryant, forget it. That's one team I'd hate to see in Round 1.....but there's the Bynum wild card. But my guess is that Bynum will be worked in as the first big off the bench, seeing no more than 15-20 minutes in the first round. I can't see Jackson feeling the need to throw him into the fire without much time with Gasol.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 06:15 PM
|
#3
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,113
|
I've been thinking about this one myself for the last few days... I think it's the Spurs or Hornets, I chose the Hornets for this particular poll.
I think the Lakers are the most difficult matchup of the three, I do however think we could beat them in a 7 game series. It would be a 6-7 game series that could either way, in my mind... it would really just come down to who plays well on those given nights. We have some matchup problems against them, and they likewise against us. Yeah they have Kobe Bryant, but we have this guy who is pretty good too. Forgot his name though... as good as Odom looked on Friday, he was only 9-32 in the first 3 games against the Mavericks, so I'm not sure if Odom exposes a flaw in our defense as much as it appeared so on Friday.
Bynum is the wildcard though, I agree.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 06:41 PM
|
#4
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,030
|
We are most likely gonna end up with the Spurs, and that is fine by me.
But the reason why I like us vs. the Hornets is because I believe Josh, Jet, Stack can and should beat by a large margin their wing players. Peja can't defend much, and Josh should really take advantage of that matchup, and MoPete while a good defender certainly isn't the second coming of Bowen. Against Jet he would have problems matching up speed wise, and then bring Stack off the bench, as well as George to counter the physical style of Bonzi.
Whatever the differences at the other positions, we are just much better at our wings than them that over the long haul we should beat them.
However we are probably heading for the Spurs, and while I like the fact that we always play them tough, the Spurs are still the Spurs. Those f.... never die.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 06:48 PM
|
#5
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,214
|
I voted Spurs, but I don't understand the utter dread toward the Lakers.
We lost the last three by a combined 10 points. We can definitely hang with them until the final moments, we just need to play defense at the end (which we FINALLY showed on Sunday that's something we can do).
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 06:56 PM
|
#6
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Paint
Posts: 1,897
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirkadirkastan
I voted Spurs, but I don't understand the utter dread toward the Lakers.
We lost the last three by a combined 10 points. We can definitely hang with them until the final moments, we just need to play defense at the end (which we FINALLY showed on Sunday that's something we can do).
|
I must spread some rep around, first.
But Dirdadirkastan is 110% correct, we can hang with anybody, it is just locking down in the fourth quarter that will take us to the finals. If not, oh well.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 07:02 PM
|
#7
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,650
|
Ive been saying the Spurs.. and I voted Spurs.. but the more I think about it the more I realize how little it matters. Any series we play first round is going to 6 or 7 games. The most important thing is how goes into the playoffs with momentum and confidence. I think we can do that still.. and I think we can catch those top teams similar to how Golden State did us last year. .. I really dont see any of those series being any "easier" than the other.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 10:13 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 159
|
The New Orleans, I guess will be the "easiest" 1st round opponent. These are greenhorns, and their bench is suspect.
It'll also be quite "easier" to stymie their offense, stop Chris Paul and everything grinds to a halt.
If push comes to shove, Stack can always hip-check Paul a la Horry and expect to produce the same results. Paul's a very temperamental player. Bowen has shown that he can get into his head quite easily. :P
And, I'll actually prefer the Spurs over the Lakers. AJ is PJax' bit(h!
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 10:16 PM
|
#9
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,885
|
Avery doesn't know how to handle Kobe Bryant. Doubling someone in the middle is definitely easier than doubling someone at halfcourt. lol
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 10:30 PM
|
#10
|
Rooting for the laundry
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 21,342
|
I dont know guys....I understand the Paul trepidations (he was on my fantasy team) but I think the Hornets are the least threatening.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 10:33 PM
|
#11
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flacolaco
I dont know guys....I understand the Paul trepidations (he was on my fantasy team) but I think the Hornets are the least threatening.
|
If we still had Harris, I would definitely rather face the Hornets. Actually Harris would be nice against the Spurs as well. I don't know if Kidd matches up well to Paul.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 10:42 PM
|
#12
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,971
|
not the hornets
paul burns the mavs all the time, and peja owns dirk, going all the way back to the Sac days.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 10:45 PM
|
#13
|
Rooting for the laundry
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 21,342
|
Really?
Tim Duncan...Ginobili, Parker, Gasol, KOBE?
You guys are afraid of the Hornets and their thin ass bench?
I don't know guys. Have you seen what the Spurs do in the Playoffs? It's not up in the air, it's pretty much a certainty, what they do in the playoffs.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 10:50 PM
|
#14
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flacolaco
Really?
Tim Duncan...Ginobili, Parker, Gasol, KOBE?
You guys are afraid of the Hornets and their thin ass bench?
I don't know guys. Have you seen what the Spurs do in the Playoffs? It's not up in the air, it's pretty much a certainty, what they do in the playoffs.
|
I think the one team that the spurs don't want to face is us more than the other way around. Dirk is a matchup nightmare to them. They are forced to go small because of Dirk.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 11:03 PM
|
#15
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 19,413
|
It was a toss up between the Spurs and the Hornets, but I picked the Spurs because I love me some mavs-spurs playoffs.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 11:03 PM
|
#16
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,376
|
PAUL WILL AVERAGE SOMETHING LIKE 35,7 AND 17 AGAINST US...
not a good idea to play against them. Kobe cannot be defended...Duncan will put up ridiculous numbers and they are experienced...
Pick your poison...
I voted spurs...but...either way...we have to play at a top level
__________________
Mavs 4 life
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 11:25 PM
|
#17
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,113
|
35 7 and 17 huh
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 12:32 AM
|
#18
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 30
|
I think the Lakers would be our biggest challenge in the first round. But you know this is the first year that I really don't feel like the Mavs should be scared of anyone in the West. Does anyone else feel like that? Even at a 7 seed I think if the Mavs are playing their best ball like they are of late we can beat anyone. The spurs used to have that intimidation factor where I felt like the Mavs just werent on their level. But ever since that series 2 years ago, I think they destroyed those demons. I really feel like the Mavs are the NY Giants of the NBA. Dont get me wrong I'm a huge Cowboys fan. I just feel like the Mavs have been a little forgotten and now they are starting to hit their stride. Not a bad time to do it. I'm excited. This is one of the first years that the playoffs seem so wide open and I don't feel that there is any team that the Mavs cant match up with and beat in a seven game series. Let's do it.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:20 AM
|
#19
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
|
I chose Lakers because I live in LA now, and "best" means having the most fun with the win.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:23 AM
|
#20
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,214
|
You're out here?! Well, where are all the LA Mavs watch parties held then?
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:25 AM
|
#21
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: now, here
Posts: 7,720
|
Spurs? We beat these guys before and we have more 'talent' now, though it's not as perfectly targeted for Dallas South.
I don't like seeing Phil Jackson with an elite ballclub in the first round. His record there must be flawless.
NO was originally my first pick but they're a bit of a mystery and CP3 is my MVP. Close call but I'll go with the guys who we've beat and are roughly the same, if not worse, vs. the guy we can't handle and is only on the up.
__________________
watch your thoughts, they become your words
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:26 AM
|
#22
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirkadirkastan
You're out here?! Well, where are all the LA Mavs watch parties held then?
|
That's a very good question.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:36 AM
|
#23
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 17,873
|
All routes are the best route. The Mavs will bring unheralded pain and destruction upon all who oppose them.
__________________
John Madden on Former NFL Running Back Leroy Hoard: "You want one yard, he'll get you three. You want five yards, he'll get you three."
"Your'e a low-mentality drama gay queen!!" -- She_Growls
Last edited by LonghornDub; 04-09-2008 at 01:36 AM.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:42 AM
|
#24
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 6,653
|
Never thought I'd be saying this, and doesn't it sound crazy? The Spurs are who we want in round 1. If we get them, and beat them, I'm penciling in a Finals appearance.
__________________
Let's go Mavs!
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:53 AM
|
#25
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,214
|
As a young person with a lack of knowledge of NBA history, has a #7 seed ever made the finals? I know of a #6 and #8 seed, but no #7 seed offhand.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 02:02 AM
|
#26
|
Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cowboys Country
Posts: 23,336
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirkadirkastan
As a young person with a lack of knowledge of NBA history, has a #7 seed ever made the finals? I know of a #6 and #8 seed, but no #7 seed offhand.
|
Who is the #8 seed you know of? Is it the Knicks in the shortened season? I think the Rockets are generally considered an extreme outlier nonetheless.
But that's not to say that his has any bearing on this year's race. This year is different.
Last edited by chumdawg; 04-09-2008 at 02:06 AM.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 02:03 AM
|
#27
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,214
|
The '99 Knicks were a #8 seed, right?
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 02:11 AM
|
#28
|
Guru
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cowboys Country
Posts: 23,336
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirkadirkastan
The '99 Knicks were a #8 seed, right?
|
Odd season, with the strike. As I said above, I'm pretty sure that the Rockets of '95 were the *extreme* outliers.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 02:15 AM
|
#29
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,214
|
Yeah, I would agree, but I was asking a mere historical question, regardless of what is considered "extreme".
And this year, of course, would be the other extreme.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 07:52 AM
|
#30
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 261
|
I think it's crazy the majority of people picked the Spurs. In four games so far this season they've lost three of them. Personally I think the Lakers aren't as good as they're record states. I believe that would be Dallas's best chance at advancing.
As much as I hate to say it, it's not looking good for the Mavericks. If they don't make it, then as far as I'm concerned if I'm Cuban, the Mavericks should keep Dirk, Kidd, JHow and everyone else should go. A complete overhaul of the team is warranted... Now I KNOW that realistically won't happen but I'm just disgusted at the fact they are actually fighting for a place in the playoffs, I think that's completely absurd.
The flip side is, it's nice to know the level of expectations have gone up in Dallas though.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 09:00 AM
|
#31
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knickfan
As much as I hate to say it, it's not looking good for the Mavericks. If they don't make it, then as far as I'm concerned if I'm Cuban, the Mavericks should keep Dirk, Kidd, JHow and everyone else should go. A complete overhaul of the team is warranted... Now I KNOW that realistically won't happen but I'm just disgusted at the fact they are actually fighting for a place in the playoffs, I think that's completely absurd.
|
That sounds like a better plan for the Knicks than the Mavs...
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 09:28 AM
|
#32
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Close to the Arctic Circle
Posts: 6,161
|
I would pick either the Spurs or the Hornets instead of the Lakers. Sure, the Hornets burned us in the season so far (1-2), but you don't know how it will work in the playoffs. Sure, CP3 is having a great season, but he hasn't any playoff experience. Also their bench is quite thin. Yes, we are 1-3 against the Spurs, but I think we still can handle them. Imo, even better than the Hornets. I'm not sure if we would have lost the last game with a healthy Dirk.
The Lakers are the worst matchup, because during the last games (seasons) we weren't able to shutdown Kobe. Okay, in the last game he was quieter than usual but still...
In particular order:
1. Spurs
2. Hornets
3. LA
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 09:56 AM
|
#33
|
Guru
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: California
Posts: 16,670
|
I voted the Hornets. Weak bench and inexperience.
The Spurs will be out for blood after the Mavs beat them in game 7 a couple years ago. I have visions of Parker and Ginobli driving at will.
I want no part of Kobe, Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Radmanovic, Farmar, Vuijic, and Fisher in the first round.
__________________
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 10:04 AM
|
#34
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 648
|
I voted Lakers, not because it's the easiest first round matchup for the mav's, because it would be the most satisfying series victory........
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 10:22 AM
|
#35
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: hogwarts - school of witchcraft and wizardry
Posts: 2,301
|
In the playoffs the Bench does not matter as much...it is nice to have but starters get more burn and step up...rotations are shortened to 7-8 players (except for Avery who still will play 12).
I'd still rather play the Hornets. no more bobby jax to destroy us.
__________________
i bleed burnt orange. Hook 'Em Horns \m/
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
|
#36
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,181
|
Gotta be Hornets. You can't think the Spurs will lose in the first round. People need to remember that we're the only team that's beaten them in the playoffs....in the last 3 years. Before that, they were beat by the STACKED Lakers team. Year before that they won it all. This isn't a team that you want to see in the playoffs. Only beaten twice in the last 5 years. Let that sink in. The Hornets don't have a bench and I think we match up extremely well with them.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 11:21 AM
|
#37
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 41.21.1
Posts: 36,143
|
The West is so fierce with competition this year that we're all just going to beat the hell out of each other until the last team standing gets to face a fresh Celtics (possibly Pistons) team in the Finals...
__________________
These days being a fan is a competition to see who can be the most upset when
your team loses. That proves you love winning more. That's how it works.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 11:40 AM
|
#38
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 17,873
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MavsFanFinley
I voted the Hornets. Weak bench and inexperience.
The Spurs will be out for blood after the Mavs beat them in game 7 a couple years ago. I have visions of Parker and Ginobli driving at will.
I want no part of Kobe, Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Radmanovic, Farmar, Vuijic, and Fisher in the first round.
|
I actually think the Spurs will be more complacent than they would have been if we had re-matched them last playoffs.
Either way, who cares. I'm not scared of the Spurs. For all the complaints of the Mavs being "old and slow," the Spurs are as old and slow as it gets.
__________________
John Madden on Former NFL Running Back Leroy Hoard: "You want one yard, he'll get you three. You want five yards, he'll get you three."
"Your'e a low-mentality drama gay queen!!" -- She_Growls
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 11:45 AM
|
#39
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Close to the Arctic Circle
Posts: 6,161
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikeball
In the playoffs the Bench does not matter as much...it is nice to have but starters get more burn and step up...rotations are shortened to 7-8 players (except for Avery who still will play 12).
|
true... and dirk and kidd will get probably a maximum of 38 minutes while they would play 40-41 (at least, maybe even 42-43) in other teams. but avery is too stubborn to stop his rotation. under nelson dirk played long in the playoffs, but with avery his part his decreasing...
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 12:12 PM
|
#40
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,113
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MavsFanFinley
I voted the Hornets. Weak bench and inexperience.
The Spurs will be out for blood after the Mavs beat them in game 7 a couple years ago. I have visions of Parker and Ginobli driving at will.
I want no part of Kobe, Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Radmanovic, Farmar, Vuijic, and Fisher in the first round.
|
you just listed 7 names! who knows effective bynum will be, and the last 4 are just 3-PT jackers!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.
|