Krugman: Views Differ on Age of Planet

[chumdawg]

Wow. I can't believe that you exhibited such a gross misunderstanding of the "law of gravity" or whatever you want to call it, then proceeded to discuss a whole slew of scientific questions. Just...wow. Go study the gravity one first, then maybe we'll move on to some of the rest. (Hint: a simple high-school physics class would have done, but you could easily figure out where you wrong on a simple Wikipedia page, I would bet.)

Dalm: You...are not being...intellectually...honest. That is the problem people have with you. It's not just that your ideas don't mesh with theirs. It's that you cannot apply a standard with integrity.

[Dirkadirkastan]

Originally Posted by chumdawg

Wow. I can't believe that you exhibited such a gross misunderstanding of the "law of gravity" or whatever you want to call it, then proceeded to discuss a whole slew of scientific questions. Just...wow. Go study the gravity one first, then maybe we'll move on to some of the rest. (Hint: a simple high-school physics class would have done, but you could easily figure out where you wrong on a simple Wikipedia page, I would bet.)

Dalm: You...are not being...intellectually...honest. That is the problem people have with you. It's not just that your ideas don't mesh with theirs. It's that you cannot apply a standard with integrity.

Well said.

The double standard is obvious, even embraced. You are in no position to objectively scrutinize scientific theories when you take translated rotting texts as axiomatic.

[dalmations202]

Originally Posted by chumdawg

Wow. I can't believe that you exhibited such a gross misunderstanding of the "law of gravity" or whatever you want to call it, then proceeded to discuss a whole slew of scientific questions. Just...wow. Go study the gravity one first, then maybe we'll move on to some of the rest. (Hint: a simple high-school physics class would have done, but you could easily figure out where you wrong on a simple Wikipedia page, I would bet.)

Dalm: You...are not being...intellectually...honest. That is the problem people have with you. It's not just that your ideas don't mesh with theirs. It's that you cannot apply a standard with integrity.

Glad people have a problem with me.

Obviously you aren't smart enough to actually know the answers to any of the stuff I wrote..........and Yes I actually know I skewed the law of Gravity but there are even issues with it. Study it. Even if I give you that one item -- you still can't answer the other issues. Science has no answer. It has wild assumptions.

And then you get to the double standard. You tell me I am at it, but don't even realize how bad you are doing it.

I admit I can't prove some of my answers.
On the other hand science says we don't have an answer so we will produce answers WE OURSELVES have proven wrong and pass it off as truth. That is what bothers me the most.

So when you talk honesty........look in the mirror.

As far as whether anyone on this board likes me or not -- I don't know any of you and frankly this is a board.......ban me if you wish. Being banned for presenting a differing opinion without attacking anyone would not effect me in any way, so feel free.