09-11-2003, 08:53 AM
|
#1
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2001
Location: sport
Posts: 39,422
|
would the cowboys be better if....
would the cowboys be better if they just lined up another running back in the backfield and put extra blockers/tight ends into the game in place of the receivers?
QCar can't throw the ball well enough to be a legitimate threat at the QB spot....at least they could take a look at another running back to try and find the RB of the future if hambrick doesn't pan out..and we wouldn't have to watch QCar anymore...
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 09:06 AM
|
#2
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,673
|
RE: would the cowboys be better if....
maybe if they ran the option all the time...
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 09:21 AM
|
#3
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2001
Location: sport
Posts: 39,422
|
would the cowboys be better if....
put galloway as the QB
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 09:58 AM
|
#4
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 40,924
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: Big Boy Laroux
maybe if they ran the option all the time...
|
Qspare would get mauled if we ran the option. The option is not a viable NFL scheme. Yeah...let's do that...the #1 pick is ours! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 10:09 AM
|
#5
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,673
|
RE: would the cowboys be better if....
anything that keeps the cowboy qbs from throwing the ball...
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 10:45 AM
|
#6
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,063
|
would the cowboys be better if....
they moved to NFL Europe?
__________________
Hey, Kool Thing, come here. There's something I got to ask you. I just wanna know, what are you gonna do for me?
I mean, are you gonna liberate us girls from male white corporate oppression?
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 11:12 AM
|
#7
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2001
Location: sport
Posts: 39,422
|
would the cowboys be better if....
sturm...that may be a level or two too high for QCar. If they played high school ball, QCar could probably compete at the 3A level here in Texas...a good 3A, but not a dominant team
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 11:47 AM
|
#8
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,673
|
RE: would the cowboys be better if....
carter could probably play some mean 6-man football... less people that could potentially pick off passes...
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 02:23 PM
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 40,924
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: Big Boy Laroux
carter could probably play some mean 6-man football... less people that could potentially pick off passes...
|
You know....that is a great point. Plus, all the Qspare lovers could see him run up to the line of scrimmage and throw pass after pass into the turf. They would get to see that awesome talent on display an additional 20-30 times a game in 6-man.
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 03:36 PM
|
#10
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,000
|
RE: would the cowboys be better if....
Say what you want, but he beat out the guy some of you was pulling for and said he wouldn't beat out. QUINCY CARTER IS THE STARTER
I am done with this thread
__________________
Quincy Carter 4 President
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 03:42 PM
|
#11
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 8,625
|
would the cowboys be better if....
We all cheer for the same football team but we all like to bash our qb. I will never understand that.
__________________
1996-2005
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 03:44 PM
|
#12
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Robot Hell, NJ
Posts: 9,574
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: QCarFan
Say what you want, but he beat out the guy some of you was pulling for and said he wouldn't beat out. QUINCY CARTER IS THE STARTER
I am done with this thread
|
I was hoping you wouldn't let them suck you in. Just let the we hate Quincy lovefest die on it's own.
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif[/img]
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 03:46 PM
|
#13
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 8,625
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: dirno2000
Quote:
Originally posted by: QCarFan
Say what you want, but he beat out the guy some of you was pulling for and said he wouldn't beat out. QUINCY CARTER IS THE STARTER
I am done with this thread
|
I was hoping you wouldn't let them suck you in.
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif[/img]
|
Yea. Its simple. They got bored and decided to bring the Najera and Quincy bashing back up. Simple.
__________________
1996-2005
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 03:47 PM
|
#14
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 40,924
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: QCarFan
Say what you want, but he beat out the guy some of you was pulling for and said he wouldn't beat out. QUINCY CARTER IS THE STARTER
I am done with this thread
|
What kind of dumbass are you? What does this statement have to do with the topic of this thread? Did anyone mention that he wasn't the starter? The question was asked if the Cowboys would be better if they didn't throw the ball. Can you please not clutter up every freaking thread with your broken record bullshit about Qspare beating out Hutchisuck? Everyone has stated that ad naseum. You are just too ignorant to read the 8000 posts or so wiht that message in them. You are pathologically fixated to defending Qstank. What a maroon.
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 04:06 PM
|
#15
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Robot Hell, NJ
Posts: 9,574
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: Drbio
Quote:
Originally posted by: QCarFan
Say what you want, but he beat out the guy some of you was pulling for and said he wouldn't beat out. QUINCY CARTER IS THE STARTER
I am done with this thread
|
What kind of dumbass are you? What does this statement have to do with the topic of this thread? Did anyone mention that he wasn't the starter? The question was asked if the Cowboys would be better if they didn't throw the ball. Can you please not clutter up every freaking thread with your broken record bullshit about Qspare beating out Hutchisuck? Everyone has stated that ad naseum. You are just too ignorant to read the 8000 posts or so wiht that message in them. You are pathologically fixated to defending Qstank. What a maroon.
|
Why are you so angry? It's like this is a legitimate football thread. Would the Cowboys be better if the ran the option???? The whole thread is "na na na na na Quincy sucks".
And why do people hate Q Car so much? I know the QB is always a lightning rod, but this is ridiculous. It's not like we're a Super Bowl team and he's holding us back. It's not like we have some young hot prospect that he's keeping on the bench. Parcells said it: Chad is not ready. Everybody knows that Quincy can't play except the coach with 2 rings. The Bengals were trying to trade the #1 pick if anyone wanted Palmer. We could have drafted Leftwich, Boller, Ragone, Sims or any of the QB's in the draft. We could have signed on of the 2 Jakes in free agency. We have 4 mil in cap room. Obviously Bill thinks one of these guys can play. I just don't know where the venom comes from.
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 04:19 PM
|
#16
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 8,625
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: dirno2000
Quote:
Originally posted by: Drbio
Quote:
Originally posted by: QCarFan
Say what you want, but he beat out the guy some of you was pulling for and said he wouldn't beat out. QUINCY CARTER IS THE STARTER
I am done with this thread
|
What kind of dumbass are you? What does this statement have to do with the topic of this thread? Did anyone mention that he wasn't the starter? The question was asked if the Cowboys would be better if they didn't throw the ball. Can you please not clutter up every freaking thread with your broken record bullshit about Qspare beating out Hutchisuck? Everyone has stated that ad naseum. You are just too ignorant to read the 8000 posts or so wiht that message in them. You are pathologically fixated to defending Qstank. What a maroon.
|
Why are you so angry? It's like this is a legitimate football thread. Would the Cowboys be better if the ran the option???? The whole thread is "na na na na na Quincy sucks".
And why do people hate Q Car so much? I know the QB is always a lightning rod, but this is ridiculous. It's not like we're a Super Bowl team and he's holding us back. It's not like we have some young hot prospect that he's keeping on the bench. Parcells said it: Chad is not ready. Everybody knows that Quincy can't play except the coach with 2 rings. The Bengals were trying to trade the #1 pick if anyone wanted Palmer. We could have drafted Leftwich, Boller, Ragone, Sims or any of the QB's in the draft. We could have signed on of the 2 Jakes in free agency. We have 4 mil in cap room. Obviously Bill thinks one of these guys can play. I just don't know where the venom comes from.
|
I'm not sure myself. I don't know if they feel that if they bash Carter more than Bill will sit him on the bench and start Hutch or what. He is our qb. He is going to be our qb all season. Deal with it. Instead of bashing the guy lets talk about what he needs to do to get a win next week in NY. Bashing solves nothing but floods the board full of trash. I'm trying to figure out where the Najera bashing came from. Is it because he is mexican? That must've went on while I was away during the draft week. The Quincy Carter hate is going to be there I just don't get how Najera got involved.
__________________
1996-2005
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 04:45 PM
|
#17
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 40,924
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Then let it go.
Quote:
I don't know if they feel that if they bash Carter more than Bill will sit him on the bench and start Hutch or what. He is our qb. He is going to be our qb all season. Deal with it.
|
The first part of this quote is just for effect so I will ignore it like it should be. The other aprt though merits response....Has anyone said anything different? You just can't get past this either? Read the damn threads. Process them. Comprehend them. Please. For the love of all things good. Please.
Quote:
Instead of bashing the guy lets talk about what he needs to do to get a win next week in NY. Bashing solves nothing but floods the board full of trash.
|
If fans didn't critique the players these boards would suck awfully bad. Feel free not to respond though. That is what ultimately fills the board with trash. Trash happens when poster refuse to acknowledge facts, fail to acknowledge other people's statements, and fixate on some bullshit comment that they made up in their own mind.
Quote:
I'm trying to figure out where the Najera bashing came from. Is it because he is mexican? That must've went on while I was away during the draft week.
|
You bring up racial references at every opportunity. Give ti a rest. It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with stats. Take the time to read some of those threads. murph and kg_veteran put a lot of time and research into them. At least you could do them the courtesy to read, process, and comprehend their statements before you go off half cocked about it being a racial issue.
Quote:
The Quincy Carter hate is going to be there I just don't get how Najera got involved.
|
If you took the time to read some of the other threads it would become very apparent.
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 04:39 PM
|
#18
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 40,924
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Who is angry? I hate that Qassholefan clutters up every thread with the Qspare beat out Hutch garbage when noone else brings up that topic. Hardly anger though. It's just very annoying that this guy cannot rationally understand the point. He has such a chubby fro Qspare that he can't digest the intent of any thread.
Quote:
It's like this is a legitimate football thread. Would the Cowboys be better if the ran the option???? The whole thread is "na na na na na Quincy sucks".
|
Qspare does suck, but that is another topic in another thread. This topic asks "Would the Cowboys be better if they just lined up another running back in the backfield and put extra blockers/tight ends into the game in place of the receivers? murph then adds supporting information, but he clearly separates the original question from his thoughts towards an answer.
Quote:
And why do people hate Q Car so much? I know the QB is always a lightning rod, but this is ridiculous.
|
Noone here has ever stated hate for Qstank that I recall. A lot of us just recognize that he sucks and will not ever be the QB of a Superbowl team. Frustrated fans of all teams rip on shitty QB's of their favorite team. You acknowledge this in your next statement about QB being a lightning rod. It will never change. Not just here but in every city.
Quote:
It's not like we're a Super Bowl team and he's holding us back.
|
True. We are not a SuperBowl team and he is one of the big reasons for that.
Quote:
It's not like we have some young hot prospect that he's keeping on the bench.
|
Completely correct. We have noone on the bench at this point to plug in a nd develop. Hutchisuck needs seasoning (or to be cut if he can't figure things out). Romo should not be thrown to the wolves. It would ruin him like so many others before him.
Quote:
Parcells said it: Chad is not ready.
|
Chad isn't ready, but this thread does not mention Chad until some moron brought him up.
Quote:
Everybody knows that Quincy can't play except the coach with 2 rings.
|
Wrong. Parcells knows that Qtard can't play as well. It's just that he has nothing better to plug in there in place of Qstanky.
Quote:
The Bengals were trying to trade the #1 pick if anyone wanted Palmer.
|
Really? Why did they agree to terms with him so quickly then predraft? I know about the rumors, but the first pick is rumored to be traded every year basically. Not sure how this fits.
Quote:
We could have drafted Leftwich, Boller, Ragone, Sims or any of the QB's in the draft.
|
I suppose so. But since you and Qtardfan place so much stock in Parcells decision making ability...why do you think he didn't draft one of these guys? Qstank is admittedly not any better so it is confusing.
Quote:
We could have signed on of the 2 Jakes in free agency.
|
Doubtful. Those deals were already in place. Would you rather play for a cruddy team or one wiht prospects for the playoffs?
Do we? I'll take your word.
Quote:
obviously Bill thinks one of these guys can play. I just don't know where the venom comes from.
|
The venom comes from the fact that Qstanky can't play the position. Like all teams, fans expect greatness from the QB. Fair ro not, it is what it is. Do we get greatness? Of course not. We are lucky to get mediocre. We usually get crappy plus.
The second part of the venom question is based on the inability of some posters to read a statement....digest it....comprehend it and make an intelligent response. This is not directed at you at this point. It frustrates the hell out of many of our posters that one guy cannot move past the "hutchisuck got beat out by Qspare my daddy is bigge than your daddy bullshit" even though 100% of all of the other posters have acknowledged that tiny fact. Unfortunately, that same poster(s) just can't bring themselves to admit that Qtard sucks balls. it's just that he is better than the other options on our current roster. Until that/those poster/posters do that....it will be a bloodbath.
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 07:30 PM
|
#19
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Robot Hell, NJ
Posts: 9,574
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
It's like this is a legitimate football thread. Would the Cowboys be better if the ran the option???? The whole thread is "na na na na na Quincy sucks".
|
[/quote]Qspare does suck, but that is another topic in another thread. This topic asks "Would the Cowboys be better if they just lined up another running back in the backfield and put extra blockers/tight ends into the game in place of the receivers? murph then adds supporting information, but he clearly separates the original question from his thoughts towards an answer.[/quote]
Let's be honest. You can't be implying that this was a thread started to discuss a legitimate football point. Maybe I'm missing something, but it sounds like he's asking if we should play with no receivers and no quarterback. Kind of humorous, but not a legitimate football point.
Quote:
It's not like we're a Super Bowl team and he's holding us back.
|
[/quote]True. We are not a SuperBowl team and he is one of the big reasons for that.[/quote]
One of many reasons. Insert your favorite QB and we're still a long way away
Quote:
Everybody knows that Quincy can't play except the coach with 2 rings.
|
[/quote]Wrong. Parcells knows that Qtard can't play as well. It's just that he has nothing better to plug in there in place of Qstanky.[/quote]
The reason he has nothing better is because he didn't seek anything better. He's been here since Jan.
Quote:
Quote:
The Bengals were trying to trade the #1 pick if anyone wanted Palmer.
|
|
Really? Why did they agree to terms with him so quickly then predraft? I know about the rumors, but the first pick is rumored to be traded every year basically. Not sure how this fits.[/quote]
The 1st pick is rumored to be traded almost every year because it can be acquired almost every year for the right price. There were too many outlets reporting it for it not to have any validity. I'm not saying they were giving it away, but with the 5th pick and something else, we could have had #1. Also I don't remember hearing Houston was shoping the pick last year. I definitly don't remember Atl. shopping it when they had it. It fits in because Parcells had options.
Quote:
We could have drafted Leftwich, Boller, Ragone, Sims or any of the QB's in the draft.
|
[/quote]I suppose so. But since you and Qtardfan place so much stock in Parcells decision making ability...why do you think he didn't draft one of these guys? Qstank is admittedly not any better so it is confusing.[/quote]
He didn't draft any of them because he's not yet convinced that Chad and Quincy can't play. He's not convinced they can, but why take a guy who will take 3 years to develop when you already may have a good one.
Quote:
We could have signed on of the 2 Jakes in free agency.
|
[/quote]Doubtful. Those deals were already in place. Would you rather play for a cruddy team or one wiht prospects for the playoffs?[/quote]
Most guys go for the money.
[/quote]Do we? I'll take your word.[/quote]
4.25 to be exact. Heard it when Norm had Jean Jacque on.
Quote:
obviously Bill thinks one of these guys can play. I just don't know where the venom comes from.
|
[/quote]The venom comes from the fact that Qstanky can't play the position. Like all teams, fans expect greatness from the QB. Fair ro not, it is what it is. Do we get greatness? Of course not. We are lucky to get mediocre. We usually get crappy plus.[/quote]
Fair enough. I think Quincy can be good, but I could be wrong. We'll know after the season (I'll know after the season, you obviously already know [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img])
[/quote]The second part of the venom question is based on the inability of some posters to read a statement....digest it....comprehend it and make an intelligent response. This is not directed at you at this point. It frustrates the hell out of many of our posters that one guy cannot move past the "hutchisuck got beat out by Qspare my daddy is bigge than your daddy bullshit" even though 100% of all of the other posters have acknowledged that tiny fact. Unfortunately, that same poster(s) just can't bring themselves to admit that Qtard sucks balls. it's just that he is better than the other options on our current roster. Until that/those poster/posters do that....it will be a bloodbath.[/quote].
Bloodbath? That's kind of harsh isn't it?
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 04:33 PM
|
#20
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,673
|
RE: would the cowboys be better if....
just let it be noted that i said "QBs" not "QB"
they both suck. i hope the cowboys pull out enough lucky wins this year so that they don't get a decent draft pick. cause i don't like the cowboys. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
and ffm, don't try to bring race into this...
the najera stuff stems from an age-old argument, as does this carter stuff. crying foul by bringing in race is the absolute wrong way to go about it.
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 05:07 PM
|
#21
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 8,625
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: Big Boy Laroux
just let it be noted that i said "QBs" not "QB"
they both suck. i hope the cowboys pull out enough lucky wins this year so that they don't get a decent draft pick. cause i don't like the cowboys. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
and ffm, don't try to bring race into this...
the najera stuff stems from an age-old argument, as does this carter stuff. crying foul by bringing in race is the absolute wrong way to go about it.
|
Umm no. Don't try to act like i'm the one with the problem here. Someone stated above that they like to bash mexicans so I assumed that is what was going on here. What has Najera done to be bashed? Nothing which is why I questioned why he was being bashed. Race is not a big deal so don't make it out to be something it isn't. We are all grown here. I wish we would stop acting so immature when it comes to race.
__________________
1996-2005
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 04:44 PM
|
#22
|
moderately impressed
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Home of the thirteenth colony
Posts: 17,705
|
RE: would the cowboys be better if....
I would hardly quantify name calling as "intelligent response".
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 05:46 PM
|
#23
|
Guru
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,363
|
RE: would the cowboys be better if....
Let's trust in Parcells. Period.
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 08:08 PM
|
#24
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 8,625
|
would the cowboys be better if....
Quote:
Originally posted by: Chiwas
Let's trust in Parcells. Period.
|
Short, simple and true. Trust in Parcell's.
__________________
1996-2005
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.
|