05-01-2021, 11:34 PM
|
#41
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 13,149
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMC0007
Yea, the want and hustle is there but the success and growth isn't. He won't have anyone wanting to give him a raise to leave so he will pick up his final year option. I guess we could include him on a trade next year depending on the need.
|
Why would JR pick up his option? He can't get less than he's currently making (MLE-ish money) and would get AT LEAST an additional 2 years on his contract (with the last one a player option so if he bounces back he gets paid)
There is zero reason for JR to opt in. Haywood proved that last year
|
|
|
05-01-2021, 11:42 PM
|
#42
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,739
|
I am so happy with J-Rich! I think his defense is the difference we needed in order to be a contender. I was so against trading Seth Curry for him. Boy, was I ever wrong! He's easily our top defender.
__________________
Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka | Luka
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 07:44 AM
|
#43
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,452
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MFFL
Why would JR pick up his option? He can't get less than he's currently making (MLE-ish money) and would get AT LEAST an additional 2 years on his contract (with the last one a player option so if he bounces back he gets paid)
There is zero reason for JR to opt in. Haywood proved that last year
|
His value is low and he's starting here. He has had a chance to up his value all season starting every game he was available for. He couldn't have been set up for success and raising his stonk any better than here. Haywood is in a complete other ballpark. Perhaps JRiich wants to go pine ride for a contender.
__________________
you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 08:40 AM
|
#44
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: state of eternal optimism
Posts: 2,839
|
Might be time to start Burke in place of JRich. Didn't Trey start in some of the playoff games last year? My memory is that he and Luka played well together. Also, he might help with the slow starts the Mavs are frequently having, especially on the offensive end of the court. Seems logical and sensible.. I doubt it happens.
__________________
"Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it. Ignorance may deride it. Malice may distort it. But there it is." - Winston Churchill
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 09:38 AM
|
#45
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Enemy territory (SA)
Posts: 3,287
|
I’m all for Burke starting over JRich. Burke is less switchable but is still a fantastic on ball defender and fights hard on screens.
__________________
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 10:31 AM
|
#46
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 11,492
|
Burke is a relentless dog on defense, I doubt he will start over Rich for optics. But in the playoffs I could see Burke getting more minutes.
__________________
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 11:00 AM
|
#47
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,454
|
I like the idea of starting Burke and moving either JRich or Maxi to the bench depending on matchups.
Burke and Brunson don't seem to be a particularly good duo off the bench and JRich would provide some D with Brunson and THJ.
SL: Luka/Burke/DFS/Maxi/KP
Bench: Brunson/JRich/THJ/Melli (or Powell)/WCS
Reddick needs to fit in there somewhere as well.
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 01:13 PM
|
#48
|
Inactive.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,473
|
THJ and KP out tonight
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 01:15 PM
|
#49
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: state of eternal optimism
Posts: 2,839
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rimrocker
I like the idea of starting Burke and moving either JRich or Maxi to the bench depending on matchups.
Burke and Brunson don't seem to be a particularly good duo off the bench and JRich would provide some D with Brunson and THJ.
SL: Luka/Burke/DFS/Maxi/KP
Bench: Brunson/JRich/THJ/Melli (or Powell)/WCS
Reddick needs to fit in there somewhere as well.
|
It might also help JRich. I would like to see RC try bringing him off the bench to see if that leads to him making a greater contribution. At some point you have to conclude that the addition of JRich has not provided the punch expected and you have to go to a plan B. An optimistic view is that he is playing solid "under the radar" defense, but even then, his lack of contribution or perhaps even negative contribution on offense is contributing to the poor starts the Mavs are having all too frequently.
If you look at the offseason moves, the MBT attempted to shore up the defensive side of the ball. They traded for JRich and James Johnson. They drafted Josh Green and re-signed WCS. On paper, all of those were very good and encouraging moves. JJ is now gone (his defense was blah, in my opinion), Green is getting very little playing time, so that leaves JRich and WCS and the question "Are the Mavs any better defensively than they were last year?" I think we see some impact with WCS but JRich is still a question mark. Why not bring him off the bench and add some offense to the starting group in an attempt to avoid digging yourself an early hole? If that does not bring him around, then perhaps you look to move him in the offseason if he opts in.
__________________
"Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it. Ignorance may deride it. Malice may distort it. But there it is." - Winston Churchill
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 01:39 PM
|
#50
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 5,234
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rimrocker
I like the idea of starting Burke and moving either JRich or Maxi to the bench depending on matchups.
Burke and Brunson don't seem to be a particularly good duo off the bench and JRich would provide some D with Brunson and THJ.
SL: Luka/Burke/DFS/Maxi/KP
Bench: Brunson/JRich/THJ/Melli (or Powell)/WCS
Reddick needs to fit in there somewhere as well.
|
WCS is the best defensive big we have
Last night if you recall he forced a travel on Bradley Beal because Beal tried to drive on him and WCS was quick enough to stay with him. Beal got himself stuck inside realizing he didn't have a shot on that play which led the travel.
I actually continue to be amazed by the quick feet that WCS has defensively on smaller matchups he gets switched on.
But anyway my point is I'm never taking Powell over WCS because Powell is non existent in terms of defense. Yes he catch lobs and plays with great hustle but way too often he's caught out of position in terms of defensive rebounding or he simply lacks the length to contest anything defensively inside.
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 01:56 PM
|
#51
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 11,492
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MFFL
Why would JR pick up his option? He can't get less than he's currently making (MLE-ish money) and would get AT LEAST an additional 2 years on his contract (with the last one a player option so if he bounces back he gets paid)
There is zero reason for JR to opt in. Haywood proved that last year
|
Cause he’s playing like shit. He’s not a true starter so idk who’s paying him a multi year contract at what he’d opt in at.
__________________
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 02:00 PM
|
#52
|
Guru
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 15,401
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by purplefrog
Might be time to start Burke in place of JRich. Didn't Trey start in some of the playoff games last year? My memory is that he and Luka played well together. Also, he might help with the slow starts the Mavs are frequently having, especially on the offensive end of the court. Seems logical and sensible.. I doubt it happens.
|
Did you also doubt that Barea would replace Stevenson in the 2011 finals after the awesome run the Mavs had so far?
If Ricks sees a mismatch or a way to improve a matchup, he is going to put in Burke
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 02:28 PM
|
#53
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 452
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melonhead
Burke is a relentless dog on defense, I doubt he will start over Rich for optics.
|
You know what makes good optics?
Winning. If someone helps your team win, f any other 'optics'. There's no prize for optics.
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 03:15 PM
|
#54
|
Guru
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 11,492
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sefant77
Did you also doubt that Barea would replace Stevenson in the 2011 finals after the awesome run the Mavs had so far?
If Ricks sees a mismatch or a way to improve a matchup, he is going to put in Burke
|
I wonder what gave Rick that idea? He doesn’t get credit for that move
__________________
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 06:51 PM
|
#55
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,452
|
GDT??
__________________
you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 07:12 PM
|
#56
|
Inactive.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,473
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMC0007
GDT??
|
Mavs don't play against Sacramento so no need for a GDT
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 07:52 PM
|
#57
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricaLubarsky
Mavs don't play against Sacramento so no need for a GDT
|
++++++++
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 07:58 PM
|
#58
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,452
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricaLubarsky
Mavs don't play against Sacramento so no need for a GDT
|
Pow!
__________________
you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 08:11 PM
|
#59
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 5,234
|
delete
Last edited by Dallas41; 05-02-2021 at 08:13 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.
|