Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > General Mavs Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2023, 09:43 AM   #1
SMC0007
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,476
SMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Derozan would have changed this team. That type of player is who we need on thr wing. Even more than Kyrie. We need a Mobil semi intelligent big and we need a 2 way wing or someone with size who can get buckets, pass and reb.
__________________


you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
SMC0007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2023, 12:17 PM   #2
Dallas41
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 5,240
Dallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMC0007 View Post
Derozan would have changed this team. That type of player is who we need on thr wing. Even more than Kyrie. We need a Mobil semi intelligent big and we need a 2 way wing or someone with size who can get buckets, pass and reb.
DeRozan is who they should've targeted few years ago but te FO was too hellbent on only getting guys who space the floor around Luka.

Rc said the post up and mid range shots were no longer good shots in today's NBA.

What I also find baffling is that the mavs refuse to play two bigs together most of the game.

Yet look at Minnesota, Cleveland, Utah, NY and Atlanta those teams often play two bigs at the same time and not all their bigs are stretch bigs

Dallas reluctantance to play that way is why they repeatedly rank year after year in the bottom 5 for rebounding.

Each one of those teams play a traditional big next to a stretch big together

Dallas very rarely wmhas used McGee next to Wood and Kleber as the stretch bigs this year
Dallas41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2023, 03:38 PM   #3
SMC0007
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,476
SMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallas41 View Post
DeRozan is who they should've targeted few years ago but te FO was too hellbent on only getting guys who space the floor around Luka.

Rc said the post up and mid range shots were no longer good shots in today's NBA.

What I also find baffling is that the mavs refuse to play two bigs together most of the game.

Yet look at Minnesota, Cleveland, Utah, NY and Atlanta those teams often play two bigs at the same time and not all their bigs are stretch bigs

Dallas reluctantance to play that way is why they repeatedly rank year after year in the bottom 5 for rebounding.

Each one of those teams play a traditional big next to a stretch big together

Dallas very rarely wmhas used McGee next to Wood and Kleber as the stretch bigs this year
Wood and McGee as starting bigs was never a real thought for Kidd. It was the start of his downfall for me. You run those 2 in the slu for at least 20 games. Exhaust that option and get/show proof that it isn't working.

The other teams you mention have one of their 2 bigs who can be a shot blocker and or at least a mobile big who also switch and recover. Maybe McGee and Wood have that capability but we will never ever know. I would have still tried it. We spent years watch RC cater and counter other teams lineups instead of forcing adjustments. Kidd didn't even try. He fulfilled the minimal version of McGee starting but never ran another actual big along side and apparently we still don't have the data that tells him we are baaaaad at rebounding.
__________________


you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
SMC0007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2023, 05:04 PM   #4
purplefrog
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: state of eternal optimism
Posts: 2,840
purplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond reputepurplefrog has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMC0007 View Post
Wood and McGee as starting bigs was never a real thought for Kidd. It was the start of his downfall for me. You run those 2 in the slu for at least 20 games. Exhaust that option and get/show proof that it isn't working.

The other teams you mention have one of their 2 bigs who can be a shot blocker and or at least a mobile big who also switch and recover. Maybe McGee and Wood have that capability but we will never ever know. I would have still tried it. We spent years watch RC cater and counter other teams lineups instead of forcing adjustments. Kidd didn't even try. He fulfilled the minimal version of McGee starting but never ran another actual big along side and apparently we still don't have the data that tells him we are baaaaad at rebounding.
Kidd would rather play Bullock, THJ, or Holiday at the 4 than give McGee or Morris some minutes.
__________________
"Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it. Ignorance may deride it. Malice may distort it. But there it is." - Winston Churchill
purplefrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2023, 08:31 PM   #5
Dallas41
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 5,240
Dallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud ofDallas41 has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purplefrog View Post
Kidd would rather play Bullock, THJ, or Holiday at the 4 than give McGee or Morris some minutes.
Yep

He's trying to use those guys to replace DFS at the 4 and neither of them have the size or length as DFS to play that position

Then when play Powell or kleber at center with other little guys you compound the situation even more

I'm actually shocked at this because Kidd was apart of that lakers staff that played 2 bigs together doing their title year in the bubble

Then he said coming into this season he wanted the mavs to get bigger and yet he's playing a bunch of midget ball lineups
Dallas41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.