Kerry Has one position on Iraq

[FishForLunch]

Like the Saturn Ad on TV - "At this moment in time" Technically he is right

[mavsman55]

Kerry Has one position on Iraq

...along with 13 backup positions.

[dude1394]

Kerry's position like it has been most of his political life is to run like hell. To hell with finishing what we started, to hell with the iraqis.

Stick your head in the sand, shiver in your bed while the march of islamofacists continues around the world.

Hopefully kerry and democrats will be soundly defeated as they deserve to be.

[FishForLunch]

You know Kerry is in trouble when even the AP starts pointing out flip flops.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kerry nixes more troops for Iraq

Wed Sep 22, 6:48 PM ET Add Politics - AFP to My Yahoo!



WASHINGTON (AFP) - Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry (news - web sites), who has warned of deepening chaos in Iraq (news - web sites), said he would not send additional US troops even if turmoil persists into next year.



In an interview with National Public Radio, Kerry reiterated "there's no way" he would have gone to war knowing Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) posed no imminent threat with weapons of mass destruction and had no ties to Al-Qaeda terrorists.


Kerry said the United States could not cut-and-run after the March 2003 invasion. "Not having a failed state in Iraq, it seems to me, is important to our country's security," he said.


But he virtually closed the door on sending additional US troops to Iraq if he has no success in his plan to replace some of the 140,000 US personnel with soldiers from other countries and Iraqi security forces.


"I do not intend to increase troops," said the Massachusetts senator, running in the November 2 election to unseat President George W. Bush (news - web sites).


"I intend to get the process in place that I described and I believe as a new president, with new credibility, with a fresh start, that I have the ability to be able to change the dynamics on the ground."


Kerry again recognized that there was little immediate enthusiasm among other countries for sending troops to Iraq but blamed this on what he called Bush's inept and "arrogant" diplomacy.


"This president has so little credibility and so little ability to bring those countries to our side that you can't do it," he said. "I acknowledge it is a difficult task. But it is the only way, ultimately, to be successful."


But the Democrat's staunch refusal to consider sending more US troops contrasted with his remarks in a televised interview in April, when he also spoke of resistance among US allies to putting boots on the ground in Iraq.


"If it requires more troops in order to create the stability that eliminates the chaos that can provide the groundwork for other countries, that's what we have to do," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

[LRB]

Kerry is indecisive as they come. If America wants another Vietnam, then Ameica should elect John "Flip Flop" Kerry, because if Kerry is elected he will turn Iraq into the next vietnam. Instead of 1000's of casulaties, we'll see 10's of thousands of causualties. Kerry will institute the draft. He'll micromanage the military and refuse to fund and supply our troops. Ultimately he will withdraw from Iraq leaving it in total chaos or even worse in the hands of terrorists. If America wants to be open to terrorist attacks because we have a coward as Commander in Chief, then Kerry is the man.

[FishForLunch]

Inside the Beltway


By John McCaslin


Kerry out attack

Already posted by DOC