It's for the children. Democrats are nuts

[dude1394]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...pid=sec-nation

Citing a local 1982 "fair practices" law, the city solicitor has given the Scouts until Dec. 3 to renounce its policy of excluding homosexuals or forfeit the grand, Beaux-Arts building it has rented from the city for $1 a year since 1928.

"While we respect the right of the Boy Scouts to prohibit participation in its activities by homosexuals," the solicitor, Romulo Diaz, said last week in an interview, "we will not subsidize that discrimination by passing on the costs to the people of Philadelphia."

The city has yet to complete an official assessment of the property. But it has tentatively placed the market value at $200,000 a year and has invited the Boy Scouts to remain in the nearly 100-year-old building as paying tenants.

The confrontation between the city and the nation's third-largest Scouts chapter has been building for four years, with each side blaming the other for backing out of previous agreements and for escalating tensions.

The local branch, which operates as the Cradle of Liberty Council, tried to skirt the bylaw in 2004 by issuing a four-line statement, which concluded: "Prejudice, intolerance and unlawful discrimination in any form are unacceptable within the ranks of Cradle of Liberty Council."

The statement satisfied the city until gay rights groups worried that "unlawful discrimination" gave the chapter cover to continue the anti-homosexual hiring practices of the Boy Scouts of America.

[kg_veteran]

Typical.

[Usually Lurkin]

aahh, government ownership.

[Rhylan]

Hey man, this sounds good to me... you want liberty, you get away from government. Proves every point I've been trying to make for years...

[dude1394]

Are you talking local, national, what? You talking school districts. It's ridiculous to think you can "get away" from government when government is pervasive.

This is as much a local issue as anything. Unless (which I don't see here) someone is bringing case against the guvment for doing this. This is a guvment employee interpreting the law in a stupid way.

Maybe he gets elected by a lot of gay voters or something. Pathetic really.