Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Everything Else > Other Sports Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2010, 09:22 AM   #1
Male30Dan
Diamond Member
 
Male30Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 8,141
Male30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

http://twitter.com/TBrownYahoo/status/11608512668897280

Then you give that muthafucka a 6th year. For 3 critical reasons you do that. One to show the Yankees that they can't have everything they want. Two to show other free agents that this is the place to be. Three to have a damn good pitching staff. Then you go after Grienke as well instead of going after Crawford and hopefully add 1 bat (or resign Vlad). That is not pie in the sky stuff - if we sign Lee that all could happen.
__________________
Male30Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 10:11 AM   #2
sike
The Preacha
 
sike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rock
Posts: 36,066
sike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond reputesike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Male29Dan View Post
Then you go after Grienke as well instead of going after Crawford and hopefully add 1 bat (or resign Vlad). That is not pie in the sky stuff - if we sign Lee that all could happen.
Lee and Grienke? Does anyone think that is an actual possibility?

Lee, Grienke, CJ, Lewis! Would there be a better 4 in the majors?
__________________

ok, we've talked about the problem of evil, and the extent of the atonement's application, but my real question to you is, "Could Jesus dunk?"
sike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 10:52 AM   #3
Male30Dan
Diamond Member
 
Male30Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 8,141
Male30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sike View Post
Lee and Grienke? Does anyone think that is an actual possibility?
If we are truly moving towards a 90-95m payroll as has been discussed, absolutely it is possible. It just depends on whether or not the FO wants to part with Scheppers or Perez to START the negotiations.

Then you add in someone like Holland AND someone like Beltre and you have a pretty good package, but it will likely require someone like Davis as well. It will be a 3+ for 1 deal, depending on the talent of the prospects leaving.

Adding Lee at roughly 23m per and Greinke for 13.5m per raises you up 36.5m. Considering we had a payroll last year of roughly 55m, it can definitely be done. Now, there are internal raises to be figured in and other contracts that have been offered up as well (e.g. Torrealba), but of course some contracts are coming off the books (e.g. Molina).

Bottom line, I think we can fit Lee, Greinke, and Vlad definitely - but not a more expensive bat than his (like my dream scenario of Beltre at 3rd with Young playing DH or 1st).

All I know is that if we can lock up Lee, we would be foolish not to consider also going after Greinke considering the wealth of talent we could find ourselves having at SP. It would also give us an escape valve if CJ ends up moving on to the west coast when he hits FA.

IF we get Lee, get Greinke too. We have the prospects. It fits in our proposed salary structure. Do it.
__________________

Last edited by Male30Dan; 12-06-2010 at 10:54 AM.
Male30Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 10:53 AM   #4
Male30Dan
Diamond Member
 
Male30Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 8,141
Male30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond reputeMale30Dan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sike View Post
Lee, Grienke, CJ, Lewis! Would there be a better 4 in the majors?
Philly has a pretty good 4 and Oakland has a helluva 3, but yeah, we would be pretty damn good. When you factor in that Feliz COULD be our 5th starter (or eventually whoever isn't traded out of Perez/Scheppers)........ Ha - nice position to be in.
__________________

Last edited by Male30Dan; 12-06-2010 at 11:17 AM.
Male30Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 02:53 PM   #5
mkat
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: north texas
Posts: 2,186
mkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to beholdmkat is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sike View Post
Lee and Grienke? Does anyone think that is an actual possibility?

Lee, Grienke, CJ, Lewis! Would there be a better 4 in the majors?
San Francisco has a pretty good 4 or 5.

I'd LOVE to see that rotation, though. I love Greinke.

However, he does kinda scare me with his mentality. I could see him choking in the playoffs.
__________________
Texas Rangers 2011 Regular Season Win/Losses
24-23
mkat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 06:12 PM   #6
Five-ofan
Guru
 
Five-ofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,016
Five-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Male29Dan View Post
http://twitter.com/TBrownYahoo/status/11608512668897280

Then you give that muthafucka a 6th year. For 3 critical reasons you do that. One to show the Yankees that they can't have everything they want. Two to show other free agents that this is the place to be. Three to have a damn good pitching staff. Then you go after Grienke as well instead of going after Crawford and hopefully add 1 bat (or resign Vlad). That is not pie in the sky stuff - if we sign Lee that all could happen.
Absolutely. If i had the option to rep you i would.

Crawford doesnt make much sense to me.
Five-ofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.