Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > Trade and Draft Board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2004, 10:41 PM   #1
rakesh.s
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,971
rakesh.s is a glorious beacon of lightrakesh.s is a glorious beacon of lightrakesh.s is a glorious beacon of lightrakesh.s is a glorious beacon of lightrakesh.s is a glorious beacon of lightrakesh.s is a glorious beacon of lightrakesh.s is a glorious beacon of light
Default Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

Dallas trades: C Shawn Bradley (3.2 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 0.2 apg in 12.4 minutes)
PG Steve Nash (14.4 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 8.2 apg in 33.5 minutes)
SF Antawn Jamison (14.9 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 0.9 apg in 29.3 minutes)
Dallas receives: SF Todd MacCulloch (14.9 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 0.9 apg in 29.3 minutes)
C Samuel Dalembert (7.0 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 0.2 apg in 23.6 minutes)
SG Allen Iverson (27.4 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 6.3 apg in 42.7 minutes)
Change in team outlook: +1.9 ppg, -1.5 rpg, and -2.8 apg.

Philadelphia trades: SF Todd MacCulloch (14.9 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 0.9 apg in 29.3 minutes)
C Samuel Dalembert (7.0 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 0.2 apg in 23.6 minutes)
SG Allen Iverson (27.4 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 6.3 apg in 42.7 minutes)
Philadelphia receives: C Shawn Bradley (3.2 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 0.2 apg in 39 games)
PG Steve Nash (14.4 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 8.2 apg in 50 games)
SF Antawn Jamison (14.9 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 0.9 apg in 52 games)
Change in team outlook: -1.9 ppg, +1.5 rpg, and +2.8 apg.

TRADE ACCEPTED

Due to Dallas and Philadelphia being over the cap, the 15% trade rule is invoked. Dallas and Philadelphia had to be no more than 115% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if we get iverson, we're favorites and there's a good chance he can keep himself injury free when he has others to share the load
philly gets nash's expiring contract, a quality player in jamison who can dominate in the east and bradley who can also change the fate of eastern civilization, as walton would say

another possibility

Dallas trades: C Shawn Bradley (3.2 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 0.2 apg in 12.4 minutes)
PG Steve Nash (14.4 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 8.2 apg in 33.5 minutes)
PF Antoine Walker (15.5 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 5.2 apg in 37.6 minutes)
Dallas receives: PF Todd MacCulloch (15.5 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 5.2 apg in 37.6 minutes)
SG Allen Iverson (27.4 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 6.3 apg in 42.7 minutes)
PF Kenny Thomas (11.1 ppg, 9.5 rpg, 1.1 apg in 33.5 minutes)
C Samuel Dalembert (7.0 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 0.2 apg in 23.6 minutes)
Change in team outlook: +12.4 ppg, +5.3 rpg, and -6.0 apg.

Philadelphia trades: PF Todd MacCulloch (15.5 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 5.2 apg in 37.6 minutes)
SG Allen Iverson (27.4 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 6.3 apg in 42.7 minutes)
PF Kenny Thomas (11.1 ppg, 9.5 rpg, 1.1 apg in 33.5 minutes)
C Samuel Dalembert (7.0 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 0.2 apg in 23.6 minutes)
Philadelphia receives: C Shawn Bradley (3.2 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 0.2 apg in 39 games)
PG Steve Nash (14.4 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 8.2 apg in 50 games)
PF Antoine Walker (15.5 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 5.2 apg in 52 games)
Change in team outlook: -12.4 ppg, -5.3 rpg, and +6.0 apg.

TRADE ACCEPTED

Due to Dallas and Philadelphia being over the cap, the 15% trade rule is invoked. Dallas and Philadelphia had to be no more than 115% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

philly gets walker's expiring contract in 2005 and nash's expiring contract this year..billy king is starving for cap room
we eat kenny thomas' and maculloch's contracts, but it's a fair price to pay for iverson
rakesh.s is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-12-2004, 10:44 PM   #2
jayC
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,460
jayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nice
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

No way thats way too much to give up for just AI and Dalmbert.
jayC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 10:45 PM   #3
grndmstr_c
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
grndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE: Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

No, and no.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
grndmstr_c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 10:56 PM   #4
twelli
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,586
twelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant futuretwelli has a brilliant future
Default RE: Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

The mavs are a good team already. So the idea of any trade should be to add some quality pieces to the core of players (Big Three). To bring in a high caliber player like Iverson would turn everything upside down and it would take at least one season to make it work again. Cuban will give the existing team one more try in the playoffs. And if we can't get to the WCF again a radical change is going to happen then.
__________________
At the end of each practice, the Mavs conduct a competition and ring a bell whenever someone makes 20 of 25 3-point attempts.

“He’s always around 23 or 24,” West said. “The bell rings every day.”
twelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 11:33 PM   #5
DNNF
Golden Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,161
DNNF will become famous soon enoughDNNF will become famous soon enough
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

Why the hell do we need another 38 % FG shooter? Walker is enough !!
DNNF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 11:33 PM   #6
Jamisonite
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,220
Jamisonite is on a distinguished road
Default RE: Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

why the hell do u trade nash...then we are left with 2 pgs that arent starting material
__________________
Jamisonite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 11:51 PM   #7
DubOverdose
Diamond Member
 
DubOverdose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,181
DubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant futureDubOverdose has a brilliant future
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

Iverson shoots too much to be on the Mavs. Dirk and Finley would never get the ball.
DubOverdose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 09:04 AM   #8
MightyToine
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,910
MightyToine is infamous around these partsMightyToine is infamous around these partsMightyToine is infamous around these partsMightyToine is infamous around these partsMightyToine is infamous around these partsMightyToine is infamous around these partsMightyToine is infamous around these parts
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

Quote:
Originally posted by: DNNF
Why the hell do we need another 38 % FG shooter? Walker is enough !!


Ummm...Walker is shooting 42%, DNNF. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]


He shot 38% LAST YEAR when he was Fat and out-of-shape.

__________________
<img src="http://www.kernel.uky.edu/1996/spring/0318/art/walker.jpg
">


This was SUPPOSED to be a picture of Toine....But I guess even the Forum itself got sick of seeing him...
MightyToine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 09:14 AM   #9
dalmations202
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Just outside the Metroplex
Posts: 5,539
dalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

AI, Vinsanity, Big Dog, TMac, Kobe, all volume scorers. All Very good at it. Not what the Mavericks need. They would make very little difference in this team, as you are only going to get a certain # of shots a game. So No, and No. Dallas needs to defend better, not worry about scoring more.
__________________


"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have". Gerald Ford

"Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne

There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Capt. Bob "Wolf" Johnson
dalmations202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 10:54 AM   #10
LRB
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,057
LRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to behold
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

This is one of the worst trade proposals I've ever seen and probably the most likely to get us back in the lottery. AI is not a PG, so it makes no sense giving our PG for him. AI is a horrible volume shooter which would change the entire Mavs offense for the worse. The Mavs get screwed on this trade but royally. Heck I wouldn't trade TAW for AI unless we were going to immediately turn around and trade AI. Iverson would be a cancer on this team.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
LRB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 11:52 AM   #11
Dooby
Diamond Member
 
Dooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,832
Dooby is just really niceDooby is just really niceDooby is just really niceDooby is just really niceDooby is just really niceDooby is just really niceDooby is just really nice
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

HAVEN'T USED THIS IN QUITE A WHILE!

__________________
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

A fool's paradise is a wise man's hell. – Thomas Fuller
Dooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 12:46 PM   #12
kg_veteran
Old School Balla
 
kg_veteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 13,097
kg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond reputekg_veteran has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE:Iverson to dallas proposal(s)

Burn the mother down.
__________________
The Official KG Twitter Feed
kg_veteran is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.