Dallas-Mavs.com Forums

Go Back   Dallas-Mavs.com Forums > Mavs / NBA > Trade and Draft Board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2005, 11:41 AM   #1
bobatundi
Golden Member
 
bobatundi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,648
bobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Trade with Portland?

Just thought I'd stir the pot a little with this one.

Dallas Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Erick Dampier
6-11 C from Mississippi State
9.2 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 0.9 apg in 27.3 minutes
Incoming
Ruben Patterson
6-5 SF from Cincinnati
11.6 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 2.0 apg in 28.0 minutes
Joel Przybilla
7-1 C from Minnesota
6.4 ppg, 7.7 rpg, 1.0 apg in 24.4 minutes
Change in team outlook: +8.8 ppg, +3.1 rpg, and +2.1 apg.


Portland Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Ruben Patterson
6-5 SF from Cincinnati
11.6 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 2.0 apg in 28.0 minutes
Joel Przybilla
7-1 C from Minnesota
6.4 ppg, 7.7 rpg, 1.0 apg in 24.4 minutes
Incoming
Erick Dampier
6-11 C from Mississippi State
9.2 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 0.9 apg in 27.3 minutes
Change in team outlook: -8.8 ppg, -3.1 rpg, and -2.1 apg.

Why the Mavs do it:
If Stack's not coming back, Patterson could be a good option at the backup 3, personality/attitude notwithstanding. The way Damp is playing this year, is Przybilla much of a downgrade? 24 MPG each out of Przybilla and Diop would make me happy, compared to watching Damp just stand around out there.

Why the Blazers do it:
They get something for Patterson. And I'm bored at work today so I figured I'd post something.
bobatundi is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-30-2005, 03:00 PM   #2
young_gunner
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 42
young_gunner has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Protland gets nothing in return, so i would think that they wouldnt make the trade..
If i were the mavs i would make that trade. Przybilla is a decent center and a good shot blocker, and Patterson is a nice addition to the defensive side of the ball..
young_gunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2005, 03:19 PM   #3
aexchange
Boom goes the Dynamite!
 
aexchange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,008
aexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant futureaexchange has a brilliant future
Default

no thank you to the nanny stopper.
aexchange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2005, 04:11 PM   #4
Dirkenstien
Diamond Member
 
Dirkenstien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,048
Dirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant futureDirkenstien has a brilliant future
Default

This trade would be very good for the Mavs. Pryzbilla will produce when given decent floor time and Patterson would be a good energy/defense 2 or 3 off of the bench. With that said, I don't think Portland would do it although it would help them to get another veteran player in their lineup
__________________


''Nowitzki'' is a German word that, translated, means, ''Good Lord, doesn't this guy ever miss?''

-Miami paper on Dirk Nowitzki
Dirkenstien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2005, 09:23 PM   #5
EricaLubarsky
Inactive.
 
EricaLubarsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 42,913
EricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond reputeEricaLubarsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Portland didnt even want Malik Rose for Patterson. Why would they take Dampier's contract, AND give away a talented young guy.
EricaLubarsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2005, 09:25 PM   #6
bobatundi
Golden Member
 
bobatundi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,648
bobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond reputebobatundi has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricaLubarsky
Portland didnt even want Malik Rose for Patterson. Why would they take Dampier's contract, AND give away a talented young guy.
Don't really think they would...I was just playing with the numbers after reading an article on Patterson and thinking he could fit in here. I think the Blazers would be idiots to make this trade...but at least it works according to the CBA!
bobatundi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2005, 11:18 PM   #7
jayC
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,460
jayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nicejayC is just really nice
Default

I hate patterson. If all Dampier does is collect 8 points and 8 rebounds on the season we will be fine. Pryzbilla doesn't blow me away. Damp and Diop are the best tandem the mavs have had in the Cuban era and maybe ever.
jayC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2005, 02:32 AM   #8
alby
Guru
 
alby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,241
alby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond reputealby has a reputation beyond repute
Default

i hate patterson.
__________________


Contact Me
Twitter: www.twitter.com/alnguyen84
Facebook: www.facebook.com/alnguyen84
alby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2005, 02:32 AM   #9
Five-ofan
Guru
 
Five-ofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,016
Five-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond reputeFive-ofan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Anyone see JPs game today? He is capable of some monster games.
Five-ofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.