So the democrat strategy just became a political ad.

[dude1394]

Here is Charles Rangel and Lynne Woolsey talking about what they will do if they win the congress. Sounds a lot like what they did to the south vietnamese when we left.

Tuesday, September 26th, 2006
Want To Lose Iraq? Vote Democratic

Whoa, whoa, that’s way unfair, you may say…but let Charlie Rangel and Lynn Woolsey set you straight on what a Democratic House will mean for the war:

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) will chair the powerful Ways and Means Committee if Democrats win control of the House next year, but his main goal in 2007 does not fall within his panel’s jurisdiction.

“I can’t stop this war,” a frustrated Rangel said in a recent interview, reiterating his vow to retire from Congress if Democrats fall short of a majority in the House.

But when pressed on how he could stop the war even if Democrats control the House during the last years of President Bush’s second term, Rangel paused before saying, “You’ve got to be able to pay for the war, don’t you?”

Rangel’s views on funding the war are shared by many of his colleagues – especially within the 73-member Out of Iraq Caucus.

Some Democratic legislators want to halt funding for the war immediately, while others say they would allocate money for activities such as reconstruction, setting up international security forces, and the ultimate withdrawal of U.S. troops.

“Personally, I wouldn’t spend another dime [on the war,]” said Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.).

Woolsey is among the Democrats in Congress who are hoping to control the power of the purse in 2007 to force an end to the war. Woolsey and some of her colleagues note that Congress helped force the end of Vietnam War by refusing to pay for it.

Democrats in the House and Senate are united in their effort to conduct more oversight of the Bush administration’s management of the Iraq war, but are not on the same page on how to fund it.

While the Senate could switch hands, political analysts say the House is more likely to flip.

Having lost the last two elections in part because of national security issues, Democratic leaders have been reluctant to spell out their exact Iraq war funding strategy.

“I don’t think the Democratic leadership should put that out at the moment,” Woolsey said.

[FishForLunch]

You guys are forgetting one thing, "They care for the children"

[Drbio]

Originally Posted by libidiot

“I don’t think the Democratic leadership should put that out at the moment,” Woolsey said.

Yeah really....why would the American people need to know about the stance of those running for office ahead of time?

Idiots.

[MavsX]

i hate dems