 |
|
11-29-2005, 02:26 PM
|
#1 |
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,250
  |
Tim Thomas
Do u guys think it would work out somehow if we traded for Tim..I kno he has a bad reputation and is a under achiever...but we have turned guys like that into great contributers in the past so maybe we could do it with him. He is a very versitile player and might b able to help us...So what are some of the trades that would work and would it be worth it????
__________________
"It feels disrespectful when you watch these shows, TNT, ESPN, and they're talking, 'Walk through the Mavericks, that's who you want to play," Terry said. "OK. We'll see if that's who you want to play." ........GO MAVS |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
11-29-2005, 02:50 PM
|
#2 |
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,419
|
Just say no to TT.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2005, 03:06 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 207
|
I would take him, if they would take Damp in return, TT's contract expires after this year, so that would help get damp's contract off their hands.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2005, 03:11 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 842
|
the problem is who to trade? TT is a max player so you have to match up those numbers for it to work. Damp contract alone wont do it unless you throw in like a P pod but thats not worth it . The only deal that works straight up is Dirk for TT or KVH for TT and both of those are out of the question.
__________________
bring mike miller |
|
|
|
|
11-29-2005, 03:19 PM
|
#5 |
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 3,938
|
Tim Thomas is a cancer that has been in losing programs wherever he has landed. I wouldn't touch him for the vet minimum with his attitude and lack of overall game.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2005, 03:30 PM
|
#6 |
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,250
|
But tht was said bout Van Exel and Stackhouse when they were coming here but both of them turned out good.
__________________
"It feels disrespectful when you watch these shows, TNT, ESPN, and they're talking, 'Walk through the Mavericks, that's who you want to play," Terry said. "OK. We'll see if that's who you want to play." ........GO MAVS |
|
|
|
|
11-29-2005, 03:35 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 3,938
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2005, 04:30 PM
|
#8 |
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,419
|
Tim Thomas' s lack of effort and overall distaste for defense would not work on this team. He has been traded (Once...maybe Twice?) for KVH before. The team he left got better and the team he went to got worse.
We certainly don't need a no effort, no defense, malcontent on this young team. |
|
|
|
|
11-29-2005, 05:57 PM
|
#9 |
|
Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,241
|
we don't need him?
he is not a two guard. we have josh howard and van horn at 3, so why would we need him?
__________________
 Contact Me Twitter: www.twitter.com/alnguyen84 Facebook: www.facebook.com/alnguyen84 |
|
|
|
|
11-30-2005, 01:11 PM
|
#10 |
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,092
|
We have KVH who is a better fit for the Mavs. Although it would be nice to have a 6'10" SF, I don't think Tim Thomas is the one we want.
Even if we got him for some other combination of salaries than KVH, I would rather continue giving Josh Powell some development time than give those minutes to TT. Thomas will want play starter-type minutes to be happy. |
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.